In the red zone
In the red zone
复制标题
在红色区域
作者：
A. Blarer;M. Doebeli
SRR-May和Nee1正确地提出了同义词问题--单个生物实体的多个名称--作为生物多样性研究的一个重要问题。正如Solow等人所说。2显示，在本世纪提出的蓟马名称中，大约20%现在被视为同义词。使用检测同义词所需的时间来建立渐近水平的模型，同义词率和质量之间的真实关系(使用每个数量级的值)是r.=0.755(P<；0.05)。比率估计的范围从不明显和鲜为人知的地鼠负鼠(Paucitucomulata)的17%到壁猿(Perissodactyla；其他类群，有齿的%，负鼠%，灵长类59%，食肉动物56%，有蹄类56%，监视器)的78%不等
SrR-May and Nee1 correctly raise the issue of synonymy-multiple names for single biological entities-as an important one for biodiversity studies. As Solow et al. 2 showed, roughly 20% of names for thrips proposed during this century are now regarded as synonyms. Using the time needed to detect the synonymy to model asymptotic levels, true relation between synonymy rate and mass (using order-of-magnitude values for each order) is r.= 0.755 (P< 0.05). Rate estimates range from a low of 17% for the inconspicuous and poorly known shrew opossums (Paucituberculata) to 78% for tapirs (Perissodactyla; other groups, edentates 64%, opossums 64%, primates 59%, carnivorans 56%, ungulates 56%, monitos