MR angiogenesis imaging with Robo4-vs. αVβ3-targeted nanoparticles in a B16/F10 mouse melanoma model

MR angiogenesis imaging with Robo4-vs. αVβ3-targeted nanoparticles in a B16/F10 mouse melanoma model
复制标题

DOI:
10.1096/fj.10-157933
复制
发表时间:
2010-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Lanza, Gregory M.
Lanza, Gregory M.
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Boles, Kent S.;Schmieder, Anne H.;Lanza, Gregory M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的主要目的是利用MR分子成像比较快速生长的同源肿瘤中Robo 4和α(V)β(3)-整联蛋白作为血管生成生物特征的三维空间分布。在植入后11天,在静脉内给予Robo 4或α(V)β(3)靶向顺磁性纳米颗粒之前和之后,对携带B16-F10黑色素瘤的小鼠进行磁共振(MR; 3.0 T)成像。整个肿瘤体积中MR信号增强体素的百分比较低,并且在接受α(V)β(3)和Robo 4靶向纳米颗粒的动物中增加。新生血管信号增强主要与肿瘤周边相关(即,体积的50%)。对共暴露于Robo 4和α(V)β(3)靶向纳米颗粒的肿瘤的显微镜检查证实了MR血管生成映射结果,并进一步揭示了Robo 4表达通常与α(V)β(3)整合素共定位。Robo 4-和alpha(V)beta(3)-靶向纳米颗粒在所有模式中与不相关或非靶向对照组进行比较。这些结果表明,α(V)β(3)-整联蛋白和Robo 4是同基因小鼠肿瘤中非侵入性MR分子成像的有用生物标志物,但在3.0 T下MR比Robo 4更能检测到α(V)β(3)-整联蛋白表达。Robo 4的MR信号的非侵入性新生血管评估,特别是与α(V)β(3)-整合素表达相结合,可能有助于在癌症治疗之前和之后确定肿瘤特征。Boles,K.美国,Schmieder,A. H、科赫,A. W.,卡拉诺河A. D、吴,Y.,卡鲁瑟斯,S. D、通河,巴西-地K.,斯塔维奇,S.,Hu,G.,斯科特,M。J.,张洪,雷诺兹,B。一、Wickline,S.一、和Lanza,G. M.在B16/F10小鼠黑色素瘤模型中使用Robo 4与alpha(V)beta(3)靶向纳米颗粒的MR血管生成成像。FASEB J.24,4262-4270(2010)。www.fasebj.org
The primary objective of this study was to utilize MR molecular imaging to compare the 3-dimensional spatial distribution of Robo4 and alpha(V)beta(3)-integrin as biosignatures of angiogenesis, in a rapidly growing, syngeneic tumor. B16-F10 melanoma-bearing mice were imaged with magnetic resonance (MR; 3.0 T) 11 d postimplantation before and after intravenous administration of either Robo4- or alpha(V)beta(3)-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles. The percentage of MR signal-enhanced voxels throughout the tumor volume was low and increased in animals receiving alpha(V)beta(3)- and Robo4-targeted nanoparticles. Neovascular signal enhancement was predominantly associated with the tumor periphery (i.e., outer 50% of volume). Microscopic examination of tumors coexposed to the Robo4- and alpha(V)beta(3)-targeted nanoparticles corroborated the MR angiogenesis mapping results and further revealed that Robo4 expression generally colocalized with alpha(V)beta(3)-integrin. Robo4- and alpha(V)beta(3)-targeted nanoparticles were compared to irrelevant or nontargeted control groups in all modalities. These results suggest that alpha(V)beta(3)-integrin and Robo4 are useful biomarkers for noninvasive MR molecular imaging in syngeneic mouse tumors, but alpha(V)beta(3)-integrin expression was more detectable by MR at 3.0 T than Robo4. Noninvasive, neovascular assessments of the MR signal of Robo4, particularly combined with alpha(V)beta(3)-integrin expression, may help define tumor character prior to and following cancer therapy.-Boles, K. S., Schmieder, A. H., Koch, A. W., Carano, R. A. D., Wu, Y., Caruthers, S. D., Tong, R. K., Stawicki, S., Hu, G., Scott, M. J., Zhang, H., Reynolds, B. A., Wickline, S. A., and Lanza, G. M. MR angiogenesis imaging with Robo4- vs. alpha(V)beta(3)-targeted nanoparticles in a B16/F10 mouse melanoma model. FASEB J. 24, 4262-4270 (2010). www.fasebj.org