Relationship between Nutritional Scales and Prognosis in Elderly Patients after Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Controlling Nutritional Status Score and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index

Relationship between Nutritional Scales and Prognosis in Elderly Patients after Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Controlling Nutritional Status Score and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index
复制标题

DOI:
10.1159/000515212
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-19
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Nakajima, Hideto
Nakajima, Hideto
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Akimoto, Takayoshi;Hara, Makoto;Nakajima, Hideto

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景/目的:营养不良在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者中很常见,并预示着不良的临床结局。我们评估了AIS后营养不良与预后之间的关系。方法:我们回顾性评估了年龄≥ 65岁的连续住院AIS患者。AIS后患者预后不良定义为出院时改良兰金量表(mRS)评分>= 3分。根据营养不良的程度和风险评估营养状况,营养不良的程度和风险由控制营养状况(UND-CONUT)和老年营养风险指数(GNRI)评分确定。结果:218例患者(男性,62.8%;中位年龄,77岁),81例预后不良。UND-CONUT和EST-GNRI评分之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.001,r = 0.433)。根据UND-CONUT(p = 0.003),预后不良的患者显示出显著的营养不良,但根据UND-GNRI(p = 0.218)则没有。基于UND-CONUT的营养不良患者的结局较差:出院时mRS评分较高,mRS评分>= 2和>= 3的百分比较高,与肺炎相关的并发症较多。根据EST-GNRI,有营养不良风险和无营养不良风险的病例之间没有显著差异。结论:UND-CONUT对老年AIS患者出院时预后的预测价值高于UND-GNRI。
Background/Aims: Undernutrition is common in patients after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and predicts poor clinical outcomes. We assessed the relationship between undernutrition and prognosis after AIS. Methods: We retrospectively assessed consecutively hospitalized AIS patients aged >= 65 years. A poor prognosis for patients after AIS was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of >= 3 at discharge. Nutritional status was evaluated based on the degree and risk of undernutrition as determined by the Controlling Nutritional Status (UND-CONUT) and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (UNR-GNRI) scores. Results: Among 218 patients (male, 62.8%; median age, 77 years), 81 had a poor prognosis. A significant correlation was found between UND-CONUT and UNR-GNRI scores (p < 0.001, r = 0.433). Patients with a poor prognosis showed significant undernutrition based on UND-CONUT (p = 0.003) but not on UNR-GNRI (p = 0.218). Patients with undernutrition based on UND-CONUT showed poor outcomes: higher mRS scores at discharge, higher percentages of mRS scores of >= 2 and >= 3, and more complications associated with pneumonia. No significant differences were seen between cases with and without undernutrition risk based on UNR-GNRI. Conclusion: UND-CONUT appeared to be more useful than UNR-GNRI for predicting the prognosis of elderly patients with AIS at discharge.