Do the ends justify the means? Problematizing social acceptance and instrumentally-driven community engagement in proposed energy projects

Do the ends justify the means? Problematizing social acceptance and instrumentally-driven community engagement in proposed energy projects
复制标题

达到目的就可以不择手段吗?

DOI:
10.1007/s42532-023-00148-8
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
Socio-Ecological Practice Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ryder S
Ryder S
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ryder S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

拟议的跨农村工作环境的能源项目在能源转型中发挥着重要作用。虽然社区参与越来越成为这些项目的一部分,但参与的工具性动机和对实现社会接受的重视仍然没有经过严格的审查。在这里,我们的目标是强调参与者的基本原理、参与过程的结构以及社区如何看待参与实践背后的驱动力之间的关系。为此,我们分别借鉴了英国和加拿大农村工作地区面临拟议页岩气和风能项目的社区的实际经验。我们发现,社区成员常常认为参与不真诚、不充分、无效且受工具驱动。我们建议采取更加以社区为中心的参与方法是必要的,并且需要超越现有的参与和接受实践和框架。这可以包括创建更具包容性的决策流程,平衡权力,并设计社区参与,以纳入除实现社会对能源项目的接受之外的多种理由。
Proposed energy projects across rural working landscapes play an important role in energy transitions. While community engagement has been increasingly a part of these projects, instrumental motivations for engagement and the emphasis placed on achieving social acceptance has remained uncritically examined. Here, we aim to highlight relationships between actor rationale, the structuring of engagement processes, and how communities perceive the driving forces behind engagement practices. To do so, we draw on lived experiences of communities facing proposed shale gas and wind energy projects across rural working landscapes in the UK and Canada, respectively. We find that engagement is often perceived by community members as insincere, insufficient, ineffective and instrumentally-driven. We suggest that a more community-centered approach to engagement is necessary and will require a move beyond existing engagement and acceptance practice and frameworks. This can include creating more inclusive decision-making processes where powers are balanced and designing community engagement to incorporate multiple rationales beyond achieving social acceptance of energy projects.
确定适当的风力涡轮机后退距离:加拿大新斯科舍省、安大略省和魁北克省市政规划者的观点
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
I. Watson;S. Betts;Eric Rapaport
通讯作者: Eric Rapaport
DOI: 10.1080/1523908x.2010.509558
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Cass, Noel;Walker, Gordon;Devine-Wright, Patrick
通讯作者: Devine-Wright, Patrick
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060
发表时间: 2010-04-01
期刊: ENERGY POLICY
影响因子: 9
作者:
Aitken, Mhairi
通讯作者: Aitken, Mhairi
权力与参与性发展:理论与实践
DOI: --
发表时间: 1995
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
N. Nelson;S. Wright
通讯作者: S. Wright
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002
发表时间: 2015-03-15
期刊: APPLIED ENERGY
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
Sovacool, Benjamin K.;Dworkin, Michael H.
通讯作者: Dworkin, Michael H.