Comparing Scores on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test in Preschoolers With and Without Hearing Loss.
Comparing Scores on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test in Preschoolers With and Without Hearing Loss.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1044/2023_ajslp-22-00352
复制
发表时间：
2023-07-10
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Grieco-Calub, Tina M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ingvalson, Erin M.;Perry, Lynn K.;VanDam, Mark;Grieco-Calub, Tina M.
我们试图比较两种常用词汇测试--皮博迪图片词汇测试(PPVT)和接受性单字图片词汇测试(ROWPVT)--的原始分数、标准分数和年龄等价性。62名儿童，31名听力损失(HL)和31名听力正常(NH)儿童，接受了PPVT和ROWPVT，这是一项正在进行的关于患有和没有听力损失的学龄前儿童紧急识字发展的纵向研究的一部分。所有儿童在服药时年龄在3到4岁之间，两次测试都在3周内进行。两项测试在6个月后再次进行。两项测试的标准分数和年龄等值都是根据公布的指南计算的。对于我们的任何分析，测试都没有显著的影响。然而，时间有一个主要的影响，在第二次测试中，标准分数和年龄等值都明显更高。NH儿童的标准分数和年龄等值显著高于NH儿童，但听力状态与时间之间没有交互作用，这表明两组儿童的成长速度相同。临床医生可以放心地同时使用pPVT和ROWPVT来评估儿童的词汇水平，但如果在一年内进行两次测试，可能会产生练习效果。这些数据还表明，HL儿童在词汇发展方面继续落后于NH儿童。Https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23232848
We sought to compare raw scores, standard scores, and age equivalences on two commonly used vocabulary tests, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) and the Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (ROWPVT). Sixty-two children, 31 with hearing loss (HL) and 31 with normal hearing (NH), were given both the PPVT and ROWPVT as part of an ongoing longitudinal study of emergent literacy development in preschoolers with and without HL. All children were between 3 and 4 years old at administration, and the two tests were administered within 3 weeks of each other. Both tests were given again 6 months later. Standard scores and age equivalencies were calculated for both tests using published guidelines. There was no significant effect of test for any of our analyses. However, there was a main effect of time, with both standard scores and age equivalencies being significantly higher at the second test. Children with NH had significantly higher standard scores and age equivalencies than children with NH, but there was no interaction between hearing status and time, suggesting that the two groups were growing at the same rate. Clinicians can be comfortable administering both the PPVT and ROWPVT to estimate children's vocabulary levels, but there may be practice effects when administering the tests twice within a calendar year. These data also indicate that children with HL continue to lag behind their peers with NH on vocabulary development. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23232848