The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas
The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas
复制标题
喜马拉雅山体验者的语法
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. V. Subbarao
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Bickel;P. Bhaskararao;K. V. Subbarao
论元结构理论认为，并不是所有的参与者在对情景的语言表征上都是平等的。在大多数情况下，某个参与者比另一个参与者(S)更突出；例如，体验式情景中的体验者参与者通常比带来体验或形成其领域的刺激(或OhemeO)更突出。这一直觉被当前的理论所认同，无论它们是根据主题角色来定义参与者(Givn 1984，Bresnan and Kanerva 1989，Bresnan 2001)，还是根据语义结构中的构形位置(Foley and Van Valin 1984，Jackendoff 1987)，也不管突显的概念是被解释为普遍的结构层次(Foley and Van Valin 1984，Van Valin and LaPolla 1997，Bresnan and Kanerva 1989，Bresnan 2001)，还是作为更一般的语篇组织原则(Givn 1984)或事件概念化(Fry 1998，Croft 1998)的结果。
Theories of argument structure agree that not all participants are equal in the linguistic representation of a situation. In most situations, some participant is more prominent than the other(s); for instance, the experiencer participant in an experiential situation is typically more prominent than the stimulus (or OthemeO) that brings about the experience or forms its domain. This intuition is shared by current theories regardless of whether they define participants in terms of thematic roles (Givn 1984, Bresnan and Kanerva 1989, Bresnan 2001) or in terms of configurational positions in semantic structure (Foley and Van Valin 1984, Jackendoff 1987), and regardless of whether the notion of prominence is explicated as a universal structural hierarchy (Foley and Van Valin 1984, Van Valin and LaPolla 1997, Bresnan and Kanerva 1989, Bresnan 2001) or as the result of more general principles of discourse organization (Givn 1984) or event conceptualization (Fried 1998, Croft 1998).