The Gauss map for surfaces in 4-space
The Gauss map for surfaces in 4-space
复制标题
4 空间表面的高斯图
DOI:
10.1007/bf01450764
复制
发表时间:
1984
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Weiner
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Weiner
Given a connected oriented manifold M" of dimension n and an immersion X: M"-~ R"+ k, there is associated to it a Gauss map g: M"~ G (n, k), where G (n, k) is the Grassmann manifold of oriented n-planes in (n+ k)-space. That is, there is associated to X a map g which assigns to each m~ M the oriented n-plane tangent to X (M) at X (m). This is one way in which one may generalize the classical Gauss map for surfaces in 3-space. Suppose on the other hand, we are given a map g: M"-+ G (n, k). Does there exist an immersion X: M"-.~"+ k with g as its Gauss map? Is even g locally a Gauss map and also to what extent does g uniquely determine X? In this paper, we study these questions for the case n= k= 2, however only under the additional restriction that g is supposed to be an immersion of M z into G (2, 2).The main results obtained are the following ones: In Theorem 1 we state a purely algebraic necessary condition on g for the existence of X with this g as its Gauss map. If this algebraic condition on g is fulfilled, the existence of X for g reduces-under certain" regularity" assumptions (a rank condition)-to solving a system of partial differential equations. We shall study this system if it is either of hyperbolic or of elliptic type. For the hyperbolic case we prove in Theorem 2 resp, 3 the existence resp, uniqueness of an immersion X with the given g as its Gauss map, if X is prescribed along a nowhere-characteristic curve in M (Cauchy problem). For the elliptic case we prove in Theorem 4 the existence of X with the given g as its Gauss map, if M is a closed disc, and in Theorem 5 we get for arbitrary M the uniqueness of such an X, if the values of X are prescribed along any arc in M, Some of these results are in a recent paper [1] by Aminov but his point of view and methods are very different from ours.(As a by-product of our investigations we prove in the Appendix a slight sharpening of a result of Chern and Spanier.) If~ is a vector bundle over M and m~ M we let~., denote the fibre over m. In the case of the tangent bundle of M, TM, we write M,. for (TM),.. IfS is a set and f:-~ S is a map, we denote the restriction of f to~,. by f,.. Also Ak ({) denotes the