Validity and efficiency of screening for history of depression by self-report
Validity and efficiency of screening for history of depression by self-report
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//1040-3590.13.2.163
复制
发表时间：
2001-06-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Racioppo, MW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Coyne, JC;Thompson, R;Racioppo, MW
由于抑郁症的复发性，需要一种快速筛查抑郁症病史的方法，该方法本身有效，或者是识别需要进一步评估的受访者的有效方法。本研究通过与一年前进行的结构化访谈评估的结果进行比较，检验了通过自我报告筛选问题评估抑郁症终生史的有效性和效率。自我报告的终生两周情绪障碍与之前访谈的结果无关。治疗的情绪障碍发作的自我报告与访谈评估的抑郁症病史相关，但对于实际应用来说过于温和。与早期抑郁症病史访谈评估相比，过去抑郁症的自我报告与并发痛苦的相关性更强。讨论了这些发现对抑郁症病史筛查和评估的影响。
Because of the recurrent nature of depression, there is a need for a rapid means of screening for history of depression that is either valid in itself or an efficient means of identifying respondents needing further assessment. This study examined the validity and efficiency of assessment of lifetime history of depression by self-report screening questions in comparison with the results of a structured interview assessment conducted a year earlier. Self-reported lifetime 2-week mood disturbance was unrelated to the results of the earlier interview. Self-report of treated episodes of mood disturbance were related to interview-assessed history of depression, but too modestly for practical applications. Self-report of past depression was more strongly related to concurrent distress than to the earlier interview assessment of history of depression. Implications of these findings for screening and assessment of history of depression are discussed.