Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists

Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists
复制标题

DOI:
10.3758/pbr.16.3.567
复制
发表时间:
2009-06-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Kelly, M. Louise
Kelly, M. Louise
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jones, Manon W.;Branigan, Holly P.;Kelly, M. Louise

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

快速自动命名(RAN;Denckla & Rudel,1976)任务是流畅性的一致预测指标,也能区分诵读困难和非诵读困难群体。然而,负责其与阅读能力关系的 RAN 组件进程仍未明确。我们报告了一项针对诵读困难和非诵读困难成人群体的研究,该研究通过实验操纵 RAN 格式来阐明 RAN 的不同组成部分如何差异影响诵读困难和非诵读困难的表现。阅读困难组在快速获取单独呈现的项目方面表现出普遍的缺陷。此外,当呈现多个项目时,他们表现出明显的障碍,而非诵读困难的读者则对这种形式表现出边际促进作用。我们讨论这些发现对于阅读组阅读流畅性差异的影响。
Rapid automatized naming (RAN; Denckla & Rudel, 1976) tasks are consistent predictors of fluency that also discriminate between dyslexic and nondyslexic reading groups. The component processes of RAN that are responsible for its relationship with reading ability remain underspecified, however. We report a study on dyslexic and nondyslexic adult groups that experimentally manipulated RAN formats to elucidate how different components of RAN differentially influence dyslexic and nondyslexic performance. The dyslexic group showed a pervasive deficit in rapid access of individually presented items. Additionally, they showed a significant impairment when multiple items were presented, whereas nondyslexic readers showed marginal facilitation for this format. We discuss the implications of these findings with respect to reading-group differences in reading fluency.