Modification of Fe-Cr-C alloys using mischmetal
Modification of Fe-Cr-C alloys using mischmetal
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/bf00416817
复制
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Peev;M. Radulovic;M. Fiset
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Peev;M. Radulovic;M. Fiset
High-chromium white cast iron is widely used as a wear-resistant material. The use of hypoeutectic alloys containing 18-22% Cr is most common [1-4]. The microstructure of these alloys consists of primary austenite dendrites and eutectic carbides, composed of M7C 3 carbides and austenite [5-8]. The demand for technological advancements and cost-effectiveness has underscored the need to improve the quality of Fe-Cr-C alloys. The alloy quality can be improved by means of heat treatment, modifying or additional alloying. Mischmetal has been used for many years as a modifying agent to improve the properties of grey and ductile irons. Reports have demonstrated the positive influence of mischmetal on the microstructure and properties of non-alloyed and low-alloyed white cast irons [9-16]. However, there is little information available on the effects of modifying high-chromium white iron using mischmetal [17]. This letter examines how mischmetal affects the microstructure and properties of high-chromium iron in the as-cast condition and after heat treatment.A basic alloy containing 3.03% C, 16.2% Cr, 0.55% Si, 0.85% Mn, 0.72% Cu, 0.92% Mo and 0.30% Ni with the usual impurities was selected and an induction furnace was used for melting. Before and after treatment with mischmetal, samples (10 mm x 20 mmx 55 mm test blocks for abrasion tests and 13 mm x 13 mm x 55 mm test blocks for fracture toughness) were poured into bentonite sand mixture moulds. Samples for structural analysis and hardness were selected from abrasion test blocks. Neutronic activation analysis revealed that the modified alloy contained 0.23% rare-earth elements (0.13% Ce, 0.06% La and 0.04% Nd). Samples were heat-treated at 950 C for 1 h in an electric furnace with no protective atmosphere and were cooled to room temperature in still air. The microstructure was examined using conventional optical microscopy. The amount of eutectic carbide was determined by means of an image analyser. The abrasive wear resistance was determined by measuring the loss of mass, following the procedure described in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice G-65, Procedure B (Rubber Wheel Abrasion Test)[18]. The dynamic fracture toughness was measured using an impact testing machine equipped with an instrumental Charpy tup. The standard Charpy specimen was notched by electrical discharge machining (EDM) with a 0.2 mm-radius slot 2 mm in depth. The fracture load was used to calculate Kid