Kaluza-Klein Supergravity
Kaluza-Klein Supergravity
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0370-1573(86)90163-8
复制
发表时间:
1986
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Duff;B. Nilsson;C. Pope
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Duff;B. Nilsson;C. Pope
Review articles tend to fall into two categories: either they are unbiased and comprehensive with a list of references including every paper on the subject; or else they are selective, focusing attention on what the authors think is important. The first kind is fair but not always very useful: one of the purposes of a review should be to spare the interested but busy reader the task of wading through the irrelevant. In this review of Kaluza—Klein supergravity we have chosen the latter course, albeit at the risk of bias. So we shall begin by stating our prejudices.We do not yet know whether supergravity [1, 2, 3, 4] is a theory of the real world, nor whether the real world has more than four dimensions as demanded by Kaluza—Klein theories [5, 6, 7]. However, our research in this area has convinced us that the only way to do supergravity is via Kaluza—Klein and that the only viable Kaluza—Klein theory is supergravity. The purpose of this Physics Report is to present the case for this point of view and in the process we shall find some intriguing hints that Kaluza—Klein supergravity may even be realistic. We begin in section 1.2 with a brief history of the development of Kaluza—Klein theories and their eventual merger with supergravity. Ideas on the subject have certainly changed over the years and we present a critique of certain confusions and misapprehensions which pervade the old Kaluza—Klein literature, some of which persist to the present day.(For example, failure to demand “spontaneous” as opposed to “ad hoc” compactification of the extra dimensions.) The Kaluza—Klein recipe for interpreting a higher-dimensional theory as a four-dimensional theory is given in section 1.3. As the classic example of these ideas we discuss in section 1.4 the original five-dimensional model of Kaluza [5] from a modern perspective. It is not a realistic theory, nor is it typical of the kind of higher-dimensional models we are interested in. Nevertheless, it is of historical interest and sufficiently simple that it admits a fairly complete analysis of its properties, at least at the classical level. In particular, one is able to write down in closed form the symmetries of the effective four-dimensional Lagrangian, including the massive states. The novel feature is the emergence of infinite parameter algebras of the Kac—Moody type [8]. In our opinion, the most attractive Kaluza—Klein theories are the supersymmetric ones. Even here, however, expert opinion is divided between the purists, whose guiding principles are the mathematical consistency and elegance of the theory, and the pragmatists who are seeking to make immediate contact with low-energy phenomenology. Two problems spring to mind in this respect: the cosmological constant problem and the chirality problem [9]. Ideally, we would like to explain the observed chiral representations of the quarks and leptons and the fact that the cosmological constant is very small, at least in the phase in which we live. However, should these properties appear immediately at the tree