Thinking Like an Artist-Researcher about War
Thinking Like an Artist-Researcher about War
复制标题
像艺术家研究员一样思考战争
DOI：
10.1177/0305829816684261
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christine Sylvester
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Gibbon;Christine Sylvester
在《方法遇上艺术》（2015）一书中，帕特里夏·利维（Patricia Leavy）主张既要像研究人员，又要像艺术家一样思考，以创造出对社会有用的作品。克莉丝汀西尔维斯特与视觉艺术家吉尔吉尔合作，思考她的一幅绘画和实践，可以激进的艺术/战争意识和激励行动。两位作者都牢记着乔治格罗兹在近100年前尖叫的话：“如果你把时间花在给靴子的鞋跟镀金或雕刻圣母像上，那又有什么关系呢？人们正在被射杀.”这篇文章从对关于艺术和功能的辩论的简短回忆中展开，并考虑了在战争问题上像研究艺术家一样思考是什么（或者不是，就像IR战争研究和艺术创作中经常发生的那样）。然后，合著者对绘画提出了不同的观点，并通过共同努力实现研究者-艺术家模式，通过艺术来思考战争。
In Method Meets Art (2015), Patricia Leavy argues for thinking like both a researcher and an artist in order to create socially useful works. Christine Sylvester teams up with visual artist Jill Gibbon to think through one of her drawings and practices that can radicalize art/war consciousness and motivate action. Both authors bear in mind words George Grosz screamed nearly100 years ago: "What does it matter if you spend your time gold-plating the heels of boots or carving Madonnas. People are being shot…” The essay unfolds from a brief remembrance of debates about art and function and considers what it is to think like a researcher-artist (or not, as is often the case in IR war studies and art making) on issues of war. The co-authors then present separate viewpoints on the drawing and end by working together toward a researcher-artist mode of being, doing and thinking about war through art.