Rim Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced CT as a Predictor of Prognosis in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Rim Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced CT as a Predictor of Prognosis in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/diagnostics14080782
复制
发表时间:
2024-04
期刊:
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Takeru Yamaguchi;K. Sofue;E. Ueshima;Naoki Sugiyama;Shinji Yabe;Yoshiko Ueno;A. Masuda;H. Toyama;T. Kodama;Masato Komatsu;Masatoshi Hori;Takamichi Murakami
Takeru Yamaguchi;K. Sofue;E. Ueshima;Naoki Sugiyama;Shinji Yabe;Yoshiko Ueno;A. Masuda;H. Toyama;T. Kodama;Masato Komatsu;Masatoshi Hori;Takamichi Murakami
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takeru Yamaguchi;K. Sofue;E. Ueshima;Naoki Sugiyama;Shinji Yabe;Yoshiko Ueno;A. Masuda;H. Toyama;T. Kodama;Masato Komatsu;Masatoshi Hori;Takamichi Murakami

文献摘要

相似文献

本研究探讨了造影增强CT (CECT)边缘增强等影像学特征在预测胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)预后中的应用。本回顾性研究包括158例病理证实的PDAC患者(84例男性,平均年龄68岁)。以下影像学特征由两名放射科医生在CECT上进行评估:肿瘤大小、肿瘤衰减和边缘增强的存在。进行Cox比例风险分析,以确定预测无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的影像学和临床病理特征。病理特征与边缘强化的存在进行比较。158例患者中,106例(67%)行根治性手术(手术组),52例(33%)行保守治疗(非手术组)。边缘增强在非手术组比手术组更常见(44%比20%;p < 0.001)。手术组边缘增强与较短的DFS和OS有显著相关性(风险比分别为3.03和2.99;p < 0.001和p = 0.003),而肿瘤大小与较短的OS有显著相关(每增加1 mm的HR为1.08,p < 0.001)。边缘增强的pdac与较高的组织学肿瘤分级显著相关(p < 0.001)。CECT边缘增强的PDAC可以预测较差的预后和更严重的肿瘤分级。
This study investigated the utility of imaging features, such as rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), in predicting the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This retrospective study included 158 patients (84 men; mean age, 68 years) with pathologically confirmed PDAC. The following imaging features were evaluated on CECT by two radiologists: tumor size, tumor attenuation, and the presence of rim enhancement. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify the imaging and clinicopathological features for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Pathological features were compared with the presence of rim enhancement. Among the 158 patients, 106 (67%) underwent curative surgery (surgery group) and 52 (33%) received conservative treatment (non-surgery group). Rim enhancement was observed more frequently in the non-surgery group than in the surgery group (44% vs. 20%; p < 0.001). Rim enhancement showed significant associations with shorter DFS and OS in the surgery group (hazard ratios (HRs), 3.03 and 2.99; p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), whereas tumor size showed significant associations with shorter OS (HR per 1 mm increase, 1.08; p < 0.001). PDACs with rim enhancement showed significant associations with higher histological tumor grades (p < 0.001). PDAC with rim enhancement on CECT could predict poorer prognosis and more aggressive tumor grades.