Policy and practice: the EU referendum, planning and the environment: where now for the UK?
Policy and practice: the EU referendum, planning and the environment: where now for the UK?
复制标题
政策与实践：欧盟公投、规划与环境：英国现在在哪里？
DOI：
10.3828/tpr.2017.12
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Cowell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Cowell
在2016年6月23日的公投中，英国投票决定脱离欧盟，这可能会
对规划的深远影响，特别是其与环境政策的联系。而五个人
公投几个月以来，规划实践领域显示出稳定，重新谈判的举措
英国与欧洲的关系引发了一系列重要问题：我们是否会看到
欧盟环境政策所特有的严格环境标准和目标？会做生意吗
利益和基础设施支持者成功地辩称，英国退欧需要进一步的增长支持
措施？移民、主权和身份认同问题的明显突出将如何
制定规划和环境政策？权力下放的政府会阻挠或改变“脱欧”的方向吗？
流程呢？同时对具体的体制变革、规划和环境机构作出反应
将需要对精英们不信任的政治背景、全球化的好处做出回应
以及超国家治理受到质疑，而将英国放在首位是一种越来越多的言论
牵引力。
The referendum of 23 June 2016, in which the UK voted to leave the European Union, has potentially
far-reaching implications for planning, especially its interface with environmental policy. While the five
months since the referendum show stability in the worlds of planning practice, moves to renegotiate
the UK’s relationship with Europe raise a number of important questions: will we see an erosion of
the firm environmental standards and targets characteristic of EU environmental policy? Will business
interests and infrastructure proponents be successful in arguing that Brexit requires yet further growthsupporting
measures? How will the evident salience of immigration, sovereignty and identity concerns
shape planning and environmental policy? Will the devolved governments thwart or redirect the ‘leave’
process? Alongside responses to specific institutional changes, planning and environmental bodies
will need to respond to a political context in which elites are mistrusted, the benefits of globalisation
and supra-national governance are questioned, and ‘putting Britain first’ is a discourse with increased
traction.