On Skull Form and the Supraorbital Torus in Primates
On Skull Form and the Supraorbital Torus in Primates
复制标题
灵长类动物的头骨形态和眶上环
DOI：
10.1086/203427
复制
发表时间：
1986
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
M. D. Russell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Shea;M. D. Russell
by BRIAN T. SHEA Departments of Anthropology and Cell Biology and Anatomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill. 60201, U.S.A. 29 xi 85 In her detailed and informative analysis of the supraorbital torus (CA 26:337-60), Russell critically reviews many previous explanations of browridge morphology in humans and other primates. Among those that she considers and rejects is an "explicitly nonmechanical model of browridge function that is compatible with bone biology" (p. 340) and that relates to the spatial relationships among the neurocranium, the orbits, and the face. She cites, among others, Weidenreich (1941), Biegert (1957), Moss and Young (1960), Scott (1963), and Enlow and McNamara (1973) as advocating this view of browridge form and function and states (p. 340, italics mine):
