How to Evaluate an Evaluation Study? Comparing and Contrasting Practices in Vis with Those of Other Disciplines : Position Paper

How to Evaluate an Evaluation Study? Comparing and Contrasting Practices in Vis with Those of Other Disciplines : Position Paper
复制标题

如何评价一项评估研究?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Madison Elliott
Madison Elliott
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Anamaria Crisan;Madison Elliott

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

vis研究中的评估实践通常不会与心理学、社会学或其他实证研究领域的评估实践进行比较,这使得vis容易受到可复制性危机的影响,而这种危机已经更普遍地卷入了科学研究。在这篇立场文件中,我们将当代视觉评估实践与其他学科的实践进行了比较,并就如何通过使用定量、定性和混合研究方法来改进视觉评估实践提出了具体建议。我们将我们的讨论和建议总结为一份清单,我们打算将其作为进行评估性研究的研究人员和评估此类研究优点的评论者的资源。
Evaluative practices within vis research are not routinely compared to those of psychology, sociology, or other areas of empirical study, leaving vis vulnerable to the replicability crisis that has embroiled scientific research more generally. In this position paper, we compare contemporary vis evaluative practices against those in those other disciplines, and make concrete recommendations as to how vis evaluative practice can be improved through the use of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods. We summarize our discussion and recommendations as a checklist, that we intend to be used a resource for vis researchers conducting evaluative studies, and for reviewers evaluating the merits of such studies.
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
发表时间: 2014-01-01
期刊: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Klein, Richard A.;Ratliff, Kate A.;Nosek, Brian A.
通讯作者: Nosek, Brian A.