Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia
Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia
复制标题
犹太权利、民族仪式：帝国晚期和革命俄罗斯的民族主义和自治
DOI：
10.11126/stanford/9780804792493.001.0001
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Rabinovitch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Rabinovitch
在1917年全俄罗斯犹太人大会选举的全彩色海报中，犹太人民党描绘了各种犹太人寻求尽可能广泛的俄罗斯犹太人人口的支持。它既不像犹太社会党那样放弃传统的宗教和经济生活，也不像犹太复国主义者那样放弃欧洲的生活。它接受希伯来语、意第绪语和俄语，认为它们在犹太人生活中扮演着不同的角色。它寻求实现犹太社区自治的民主化，并建立新的俄罗斯犹太民族文化和政府机构。最重要的是，这些自称“民俗主义者”的人相信，犹太人的民族愿望可以通过俄罗斯和东欧更广泛的犹太人自治来实现。在思想上和组织上，该党的领导将深刻影响俄罗斯犹太政治的走向。犹太人权利，民族权利对俄罗斯犹太民族主义的起源提供了全新的解释。它认为，犹太民族主义，乃至整个犹太政治，都是在一个不断变化的法律环境中发展起来的，在这个环境中，国家有权利的想法开始站稳脚跟，并以东欧犹太人自治的要求为中心。西蒙·拉比诺维奇利用美国、俄罗斯、乌克兰和以色列的大量档案和图书馆，仔细地重建了争取犹太人自治的政治运动、其个性、机构和文化项目。他解释了犹太人自治是如何在1917年2月革命后实现的，并首次评估了1917年11月的投票模式，以确定在俄罗斯革命时期的鼎盛时期公众对犹太民族主义的支持程度。
In its full-color poster for elections to the All-Russian Jewish Congress in 1917, the Jewish People's Party depicted a variety of Jews in seeking to enlist the support of the broadest possible segment of Russia's Jewish population. It forsook neither traditional religious and economic life like the Jewish socialist parties, nor life in Europe like the Zionists. It embraced Hebrew, Yiddish, and Russian as fulfilling different roles in Jewish life. It sought the democratization of Jewish communal self-government and the creation of new Russian Jewish national-cultural and governmental institutions. Most importantly, the self-named "folkists" believed that Jewish national aspirations could be fulfilled through Jewish autonomy in Russia and Eastern Europe more broadly. Ideologically and organizationally, this party's leadership would profoundly influence the course of Russian Jewish politics.Jewish Rights, National Rights provides a completely new interpretation of the origins of Jewish nationalism in Russia. It argues that Jewish nationalism, and Jewish politics generally, developed in a changing legal environment where the idea that nations had rights was beginning to take hold, and centered on the demand for Jewish autonomy in Eastern Europe. Drawing on numerous archives and libraries in the United States, Russia, Ukraine, and Israel, Simon Rabinovitch carefully reconstructs the political movement for Jewish autonomy, its personalities, institutions, and cultural projects. He explains how Jewish autonomy was realized following the February Revolution of 1917, and for the first time assesses voting patterns in November 1917 to determine the extent of public support for Jewish nationalism at the height of the Russian revolutionary period.