Improving the Usability of E-Book Readers

Improving the Usability of E-Book Readers
复制标题

提高电子书阅读器的可用性

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Groner
R. Groner
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Eva Siegenthaler;P. Wurtz;R. Groner

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

电子书阅读器(e-readers或electronic-readers)的使用越来越广泛。电子阅读器应该满足两个重要的要求:足够的可读性和良好的可用性。在我们的研究中,我们调查了电子阅读器设计的这两个要求。在多功能方法的框架内,我们将眼动跟踪与其他可用性测试方法相结合。我们测试了五种电子阅读设备和一本经典的纸质书。结果表明,采用电子墨水技术的电子阅读器提供的易读性与传统纸质书相当。然而,我们的研究也表明,目前的电子阅读器一代在可用性方面存在很大的缺陷。用户无法直观且毫无问题地使用电子阅读器。我们发现不同品牌的电子书阅读器之间存在显着差异。有趣的是,我们发现客观的眼动追踪数据和主观的用户数据之间存在分离,强调了多方法方法的重要性。
The use of e-book readers (e-readers or electronic-readers) has become increasingly widespread. An e-reader should meet two important requirements: adequate legibility and good usability. In our study, we investigated these two requirements of e-reader design. Within the framework of a multifunctional approach, we combined eye tracking with other usability testing methods. We tested five electronic reading devices and one classic paper book. The results suggested that e-readers with e-ink technology provided legibility that was comparable to classic paper books. However, our study also showed that the current e-reader generation has large deficits with respect to usability. Users were unable to use e-readers intuitively and without problems. We found significant differences between the different brands of e-book readers. Interestingly, we found dissociations between objective eye-tracking data and subjective user data, stressing the importance of multi-method approaches.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
M. Just;P. Carpenter
通讯作者: M. Just;P. Carpenter