Moral Frames and Climate Change Policy Attitudes
Moral Frames and Climate Change Policy Attitudes
复制标题
道德框架和气候变化政策态度
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Coleman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alexander W. Severson;E. Coleman
type=“main”>本文比较了各种气候变化问题框架（道义-道德，医学-科学和经济）对支持气候变化减缓政策的影响。使用亚马逊土耳其机器人进行的问题框架调查实验，我们评估框架的气候变化政策支持，使用普通最小二乘回归的影响。我们发现了有关框架有效性的混合证据。宗教道德框架和经济效率框架是无效的，而科学框架，世俗道德框架和经济公平框架是有效的，在增加整体政策支持。此外，积极的科学框架和经济公平框架减少了气候政策支持的意识形态分歧。问题框架对气候政策支持的影响好坏参半。我们期望保守派能够响应的框架（宗教道德;经济效率）未能改变对气候政策的支持。强调科学、世俗道德和经济公平的框架有可能增加公众对气候变化政策的支持。
type="main"> This article compares the effects of various climate change issue frames (deontological-moral, empirical-scientific, and economic) on support for climate change mitigation policies. Using an issue-framing survey experiment conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk, we assess framing effects on climate change policy support using ordinary least squares regression. We find mixed evidence regarding frame effectiveness. Religious moral frames and economic efficiency frames are ineffective, whereas scientific frames, secular moral frames, and economic equity frames are effective at increasing overall policy support. Additionally, the positive science frame and economic equity frame reduce the ideological divide in climate policy support. The effects of issue framing on climate policy support are mixed. Frames that we expected conservatives to be responsive to (religious morality; economic efficiency) fail to change support for climate policy. Frames that emphasize science, secular morality, and economy equity have the potential to increase public support for climate change policies.