CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS .40. CONFORMATION OF 1-METHYL-1-PHENYLCYCLOHEXANE AND THE CONFORMATIONAL ENERGIES OF THE PHENYL AND VINYL GROUPS
CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS .40. CONFORMATION OF 1-METHYL-1-PHENYLCYCLOHEXANE AND THE CONFORMATIONAL ENERGIES OF THE PHENYL AND VINYL GROUPS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/jo00322a056
复制
发表时间:
1981-01-01
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
MANOHARAN, M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
ELIEL, EL;MANOHARAN, M
In 1971 Allinger and Tribble1 2 calculated, using a force-field approach, that in1-methyl-l-phenylcyclohexane (1, Scheme I) the conformational energies3 of methyl (1.7 kcal/mol) and phenyl (3.0 kcal/mol) should not be additive, the conformation with the larger phenyl group in the axial position being preferred at equilibrium by 0.9 kcal/mol. This comes about because the most stable conformation of the axial phenyl group (phenyl perpen-dicular to the bisector plane of the cyclohexane chair) is not perturbed by introduction of a geminal methyl sub-stituent, whereas considerable perturbation occurs upon introduction of geminal methyl into equatorial phenyl-cyclohexane whose phenyl substituent is (in the absence of the geminal methyl) most stable in the bisector plane of the cyclohexane chair. The Allinger-Tribble prediction was in qualitative agreement with contemporary NMR data4 but was not quantitatively borne out by low-temperature proton NMR work subsequently carried out with 1-methyl-l-phenyl-4, 4-dimethoxycyclohexane. 5 This work5 indicated a preference for the axial phenyl group of only 0.34 kcal/mol. However, the experimenters stated: 5 “Whether thisdiscrepancy is due to the presence of the gem-dimethoxy group or to some computational insuffi-ciency remains a moot point”. In view of the importance of the prevalence of axial phenyl over geminal methylene in a number of alkaloids of the mesembrine6 and amarillidacea7 families, which we are presently investigating, we felt that confirmation of the result of Anteunis’ group5 by low-temperature 13C