Where next for managed retreat: Bringing in history, community and under-researched places
Where next for managed retreat: Bringing in history, community and under-researched places
复制标题
管理撤退的下一步：引入历史、社区和研究不足的地方
作者：
Taylor Aiken G
近年来，有管理的撤退--有目的、协调地让人们远离气候风险--的重要性、讨论和紧迫性都有所上升。随着气候威胁的规模和范围不断扩大，学术界和政策界对这种深刻的地理现象的兴趣可能会与日俱增。这是一个重要的关头，需要进行评估，并反思地理可以为有管理的撤退提供哪些学术和政策回应。尽管有管理的务虚会为应对深刻的气候适应措施开发了一套关键而有用的工具和想法，但仍有疏漏之处。在这里，我们指出历史视角、参与性的基于社区的方法，以及从可以主导这一(次级)领域的过度研究的例子中进行多样化，作为所有方面都可以在未来得到加强。最后，我们提供了三条建议，以供进一步思考有管理的撤退。
Managed retreat—the purposive and coordinated movement of people away from climate risks—has risen in importance, discussion and urgency in recent years. As climate threats increase in size and scope, both scholarly and policy responses are likely to take increasing interest in this deeply geographic phenomenon. This is an important juncture to take stock, and reflect on what Geography can offer both academic and policy responses to managed retreat. While managed retreat has developed a critical and useful set of tools and ideas for dealing with profound climate adaptation measures, there remain omissions. Here we point to the historical perspective, participative community‐based approaches, and diversifying from over‐researched examples that can dominate this (sub)field as aspects that can all be strengthened going forward. To end, we offer three recommendations for further thought on managed retreat.