Whose fault is it anyway? A practical illustration of human factors in process safety.

Whose fault is it anyway? A practical illustration of human factors in process safety.
复制标题

到底是谁的错呢?

DOI:
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.06.005
复制
发表时间:
2004
影响因子:
13.6
通讯作者:
Megan Kornowa‐Weichel
Megan Kornowa‐Weichel
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gareth. Hughes;Megan Kornowa‐Weichel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

重大过程事故通常不是通过单一故障发生的,而是通过多个事件的组合发生的,其中一些事件是由过去的行动和故障(潜在或未发现的故障)造成的。人是业务系统不可或缺的关键特征;因此,系统、工具和设备的设计应考虑到人的潜在能力和局限性。本文展示了使用人为因素方法来提高系统安全性和可靠性的好处。引用了过去经验中的实际例子,并描述了人为错误预测的框架。就从这些类型的研究中得出建议的实用性提供了指导。
Major process accidents have typically occurred not through a single failure, but through a combination of events, some of which had contributors from past actions and failures (latent or unrevealed failures). People are integral and key features of business systems; therefore systems, tools, and equipment should be designed with the potential capabilities and limitations of people in mind. This paper demonstrates the benefits of using human factors approaches to improve system safety and reliability. Practical examples from past experience are quoted and a framework for human error prediction is described. Guidance is given on the practicalities of deriving recommendations from these types of studies.