Social Identities, Group Norms, and Threat: On the Malleability of Ingroup Bias
Social Identities, Group Norms, and Threat: On the Malleability of Ingroup Bias
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0146167210386120
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Fritsche, Immo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Giannakakis, Andrew Erik;Fritsche, Immo
群体内偏见是最基本的群体间现象之一，并且一直被证明在存在威胁的条件下会增加。在目前的研究中，作者质疑威胁下的内群体偏见的无所不在，并测试这些影响取决于社会认同和群体规范的内容在一个情况下显着的假设。在前两项研究中，交叉归类和重新归类操作消除，甚至逆转死亡率显着性影响的偏见之间的关系，英语和苏格兰的学生（研究1），以及英语和法国人（研究2）。在第三项研究中，特定的社会身份（集体主义与个人主义）的具体规范内容被证明是适度的死亡率显着影响内群体偏见。这些研究的结果表明，恐怖管理过程的社会认同的角度来看。
Ingroup bias is one of the most basic intergroup phenomena and has been consistently demonstrated to be increased under conditions of existential threat. In the present research the authors question the omnipresence of ingroup bias under threat and test the assumptions that these effects depend on the content of social identity and group norm salient in a situation. In the first two studies cross-categorization and recategorization manipulations eliminated and even reversed mortality salience effects on bias in relations between English and Scottish students (Study 1) as well as English and French people (Study 2). In the third study the specific normative content of a given social identity (collectivism vs. individualism) was shown to moderate mortality salience effects on ingroup bias. The results of these studies suggest a social identity perspective on terror management processes.