Contrast between effects of aminobisphosphonates and non‐aminobisphosphonates on collagen‐induced arthritis in mice
Contrast between effects of aminobisphosphonates and non‐aminobisphosphonates on collagen‐induced arthritis in mice
复制标题
氨基二膦酸盐与非氨基二膦酸盐对小鼠胶原性关节炎的作用对比
DOI:
10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15972.x
复制
发表时间:
1996
影响因子:
7.3
通讯作者:
Y. Endo
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Nakamura;T. Ando;M. Abe;K. Kumagai;Y. Endo
1 Bisphosphonates (BPs) are inhibitors of bone resorption, and many derivatives have been developed for the treatment of enhanced bone resorption. Aminobisphosphonates (aminoBPs) are particularly potent in this respect. We have shown previously that aminoBPs, such as 4‐amino‐1‐hydroxybutylidene‐1,1‐bisphosphonic acid (AHBuBP), induce histidine decarboxylase, the enzyme forming histamine, and increase macrophages, granulocytes and osteoclast numbers. Non‐aminoBPs do not show this activity. 2 In the present study, an additional aminoBP, cycloheptyl‐aminomethylene bisphosphonate (CHAMBP), was shown to have similar properties to AHBuBP suggesting that these actions are common among aminoBPs. 3 In experiments carried out to determine if aminoBPs affect immune responses, we found that CHAMBP and AHBuBP each exacerbated the arthritis induced in mice by the co‐injection of type II collagen and an adjuvant, a model for rheumatoid arthritis. In contrast, dichloromethylene bisphosphonate (C12MBP), a typical non‐aminoBP, did suppress the arthritis. 4 On the basis of these results, and those obtained previously, we propose that the exacerbating effects of CHAMBP and AHBuBP may be related to their ability to stimulate the synthesis of histamine and to increase macrophages and granulocytes. Conversely, we propose that the suppressive effect of C12MBP on arthritis is related to its cytotoxic action on macrophages or granulocytes.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--