A Case Study Of Fire And Evacuation In A Multi-purpose Office Building, Osaka, Japan-猫眼课题宝

日本大阪多功能办公楼火灾与疏散案例研究

DOI：

发表时间：

1986

期刊：

影响因子：

通讯作者：

中科院分区：

文献类型：

作者：

S. Horiuchi;Y. Murozaki;A. Hukugo

1984年4月4日，大坂科学技术中心发生火灾。这座建筑是一座典型的多用途办公楼，里面有各种学术团体的办公室，这些团体的居住者是这座建筑的经常使用者，还有不太熟悉这座建筑的人使用的会议霍尔斯。这项研究的目的是形成一个基础，为未来的多功能建筑物，近年来已成为越来越普遍的建筑类型的疏散指南。我们的研究小组使用问卷对火灾发生时在中心的人进行了调查，并获得了有关火灾和疏散人员采取的各种行动的详细信息。在我们的调查的基础上，我们试图分析疏散人员的特点，他们在疏散过程中对空间条件的反应，以及他们在整个紧急情况下如何经历事件的顺序。我们分析的一个重要结果是，经常使用建筑物的人和不太熟悉建筑物的人之间的差异非常明显，这些差异是：意识到火灾时的行动，选择逃生路线的标准，以及有效到达出口的能力。表1.按楼层分列大楼和住户。建筑面积主要数目方法数目被烧毁的建筑面积使用被救出的人数调查表（平方米）（平方米）住户经窗户逃生的人数所收集的数字（%）81，177霍尔斯70 70 61（87.1）7 1，177间餐厅，办公室94 94 67（71.3）6 1，177间办公室，a.霍尔斯85 83 2辆云梯车51（60.0）5 1，177间办公室63 *61 2辆云梯车39（61. 9)4 1，177霍尔斯254 158 96云梯车170（66.9）3 1，177 473办公室50 48 2活动梯38（76.0）2 1，176个展览霍尔斯11 11 1 1，124个展览霍尔斯14 14 B1 1，161餐厅29 29 23（79.3）B2 1，150个机械室9 9 7（77.8）EV 2 12，485 473（总数）679 577 102 458（67.5）* 其中7个通过救生槽疏散消防安全科学-第一届国际研讨会论文集523版权所有©国际消防安全科学协会

On April 4, 1984 a fire occurred at the Science and Technology Center of Osaka. The building was a typical multi-purpose office building which contained the office of various learned societies whose occupants were regular users of the building, and assembly halls used by people less familiar with the premises. The purpose of this study is to form a basis for future guidlines for the evacuation of mUlti-purpose buildings, a building type which has become increasingly common in recent years. Our research group conducted a survey of people who were in the Center at the time of the fire using a questionnaire, and obtained detailed information about the fire and the various actions the evacuees took. On the basis of our survey we sought to analyse the characteristics of the evacuees, their reactions to spatial conditions during the evacuation, and how they experienced the sequence of events throughout the emergency. An important result of our analysis that emerged very dramatically was the difference between regular users of the building and those less familiar with it. The differences were; action upon becoming aware of the fire, criterion for selecting escape routes, and ability to effectively reach an exit. TABLE 1. Floor by floor breakdown of the Building and the occupants. floor area main number number number of method number of floor area burned use of of rescued of questionnaires (m2 ) (m2 ) occupants evacuees by window rescue collected (%) 8 1,177 assembly halls 70 70 61 (87.1) 7 1,177 restaurant,offices 94 94 67(71.3) 6 1,177 offices,a.halls 85 83 2 ladder truck 51(60.0) 5 1,177 offices 63 *61 2 ladder truck 39 (61. 9) 4 1,177 assembly halls 254 158 96 ladder truck 170(66.9) 3 1,177 473 offices 50 48 2 portable ladder 38(76.0) 2 1,176 exhibition halls 11 11 1 1,124 exhibition halls 14 14 B1 1,161 restaurant 29 29 23(79.3) B2 1,150 mechanical rooms 9 9 7(77.8) EV 2 12,485 473 (total) 679 577 102 458 (67.5) *seven of these evacuated via life chute FIRE SAFETY SCIENCE-PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM 523 Copyright © International Association for Fire Safety Science

A Case Study Of Fire And Evacuation In A Multi-purpose Office Building, Osaka, Japan

日本大阪多功能办公楼火灾与疏散案例研究

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献