Drought neutralises plant-soil feedback of two mesic grassland forbs.
Drought neutralises plant-soil feedback of two mesic grassland forbs.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00442-018-4082-x
复制
发表时间：
2018-04
期刊：
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Bardgett RD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fry EL;Johnson GN;Hall AL;Pritchard WJ;Bullock JM;Bardgett RD
Plant–soil feedbacks (PSFs) describe the effect of a plant species on soil properties, which affect the performance of future generations. Here we test the hypothesis that drought alters PSFs by reducing plant–microbe associations and nutrient uptake. We chose two grassland forb species, previously shown to respond differently to soil conditioning and drought, to test our hypothesis. We conditioned unsterilised grassland soil with one generation of each species, and left a third soil unconditioned. We grew a second generation consisting of each combination of plant species, soil, and drought in a full factorial design, and measured soil microbial community and nutrient availability. Scabiosa columbaria displayed negative PSF (smaller plants) under non-droughted conditions, but neutral under drought, suggesting that drought disrupts plant–soil interactions and can advantage the plant. Photosynthetic efficiency of S. columbaria was reduced under drought, but recovered on rewetting regardless of soil conditioning, indicating that PSFs do not impede resilience of this species. Sanguisorba minor showed positive PSFs (larger plants), probably due to an increase in soil N in conspecific soil, but neutral PSF under drought. PSF neutralisation appeared to occur through drought-induced change in the soil microbial community for this species. When S. minor was planted in conspecific soil, photosynthetic efficiency declined to almost zero, with no recovery following rewetting. We attributed this to increased demand for water through higher demand for nutrients with positive PSF. Here we show that drought neutralises PSFs of two grassland forbs, which could have implications for plant communities under climate change. The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-018-4082-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Fagan, Kate C.;Pywell, Richard F.;Marrs, Rob H.
通讯作者：
Marrs, Rob H.
影响因子：
9.7
作者：
Fry, Ellen L.;Manning, Peter;Singh, Brajesh K.
通讯作者：
Singh, Brajesh K.
影响因子：
7.3
作者：
JOHNSON, GN;YOUNG, AJ;HORTON, P
通讯作者：
HORTON, P
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Buckland, SM;Grime, JP;Thompson, K
通讯作者：
Thompson, K
影响因子：
64.8
作者：
Engelkes, Tim;Morrien, Elly;van der Putten, Wim H.
通讯作者：
van der Putten, Wim H.