Investigating the Clinical Usefulness of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) in a Tertiary Level, Autism Spectrum Disorder Specific Assessment Clinic

Investigating the Clinical Usefulness of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) in a Tertiary Level, Autism Spectrum Disorder Specific Assessment Clinic
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s10803-011-1242-9
复制
发表时间:
2012-02-01
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Williams, Megan
Williams, Megan
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aldridge, Fiona J.;Gibbs, Vicki M.;Williams, Megan

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

社会反应量表(SRS); Constantino和Gruber的社会反应量表(SRS)。Western Psychological Services,洛杉矶,2005)是一种常用的筛查工具,用于识别可能患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童。本研究调查了SRS评分和最终诊断结果之间的关系,儿童提到了第三级,自闭症的具体评估服务。48名儿童(平均年龄= 8.10; 92%为男性)接受了全面的ASD评估。父母和老师的SRS评分随后与诊断结果进行了比较。敏感性高(91%为家长报告; 84%为教师报告),但特异性低得多(8%为家长报告; 41%为教师报告)。结果表明,需要谨慎解释SRS结果的基础上,目前的截止分数,特别是在以前确定的社会发展问题的儿童。
The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; Constantino and Gruber in Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, 2005) is a commonly used screening tool for identifying children with possible autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study investigated the relationship between SRS scores and eventual diagnostic outcome for children referred to a tertiary level, autism specific assessment service. Forty eight children (mean age = 8.10; 92% male) underwent a comprehensive ASD assessment. Parent and teacher SRS scores were subsequently compared with diagnostic outcome. Sensitivity was high (91% for parent report; 84% for teacher report), however specificity was much lower (8% for parent report; 41% for teacher report). Results demonstrate a need for caution when interpreting SRS results based on current cut-off scores, particularly in children with previously identified social developmental problems.