Judicial bypass for minors post-Dobbs.
Judicial bypass for minors post-Dobbs.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/17455057231219601
复制
发表时间：
2023-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Frietsche, Susan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Horvath, Sarah;Frietsche, Susan
要求寻求堕胎护理的未成年人通知父母或其他法律的监护人或获得其同意的州法律被广泛称为父母参与法。司法回避允许未成年人向法院申请回避父母的参与。即使在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织的决定于2022年6月24日推翻罗伊诉韦德之前，36个州至少有一项父母参与法，使未成年人获得堕胎护理比成年人获得堕胎护理更加复杂。自多布斯决定以来，至少有15个州已经完全禁止堕胎，这进一步增加了追求生殖保健的复杂性，地理障碍和不公平性。在这篇叙述性评论和评论中，我们从法律的和医学的角度解释了父母参与法律和司法绕过，探索了这个系统在多布斯事件后一年所带来的不断变化的挑战。
State laws that require minors seeking abortion care to notify or obtain consent from a parent or other legal guardian are broadly referred to as parental involvement laws. Judicial bypass allows a minor to petition the court to bypass parental involvement. Even before the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision overturned Roe v Wade on 24 June 2022, 36 states had at least one parental involvement law, making minor access to abortion care even more complex than adult access. Since the Dobbs decision, at least 15 states have completely banned abortion, adding further complexity, geographic barriers, and inequities to the pursuit of reproductive healthcare. In this narrative review and commentary, we explain parental involvement laws and judicial bypass from both a legal and medical perspective, exploring the evolving challenges created by this system in the year post-Dobbs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Coleman-Minahan, Kate;Stevenson, Amanda Jean;Hays, Susan
通讯作者：
Hays, Susan
DOI：
10.2307/2135870
发表时间：
1992-09-01
期刊：
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES
影响因子：
--
作者：
HENSHAW, SK;KOST, K
通讯作者：
KOST, K
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
通讯作者：
--
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Janiak, Elizabeth;Fulcher, Isabel R.;Goldberg, Alisa B.
通讯作者：
Goldberg, Alisa B.
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Jerman, Jenna;Onda, Tsuyoshi;Jones, Rachel K.
通讯作者：
Jones, Rachel K.