Introduction (Symposium on the Human Right to Subsistence)

Introduction (Symposium on the Human Right to Subsistence)
复制标题

简介(人权生存权研讨会)

DOI:
10.1111/japp.12009
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
Cruft R
Cruft R
中科院分区:
人文科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cruft R

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

54引入对生存的兴趣。6琼斯为这项权利辩护,反对批评它无法实现,它不够重要,它将导致权利膨胀,进而表明生存权如何符合更广泛的概念,即人的权利是保护我们最重要的利益,其中包括教育健康和生产活动方面的利益。鉴于随后两篇论文的重点,我引述琼斯关于如何确定履行颠覆人权的义务的观点[保护人权需要体制行动,首先是自己的地位,然后在必要时由自己国家以外的组织,如公司、非政府组织、其他富裕国家和国家间组织。但是,保护人权并不要求在每一种情况下都统一适用具体政策。确定确保获得清洁空气、水和食物的最佳方式并不是一个哲学问题。相反,我们需要参考社会科学家最好的实证研究,以判断什么管用,什么不管用。7.
54 Introduction interest in subsistence. 6 Jones defends the right against criticisms that it is not fulfillable, that it is insufficiently important, and that it will lead to rights infla goes on to show how subsistence rights fit within a broader conception of huma as protecting our most important interests, where these include interests in edu health, and productive activity. Given the focus of the subsequent two essays, it i quoting Jones's view on how to identify duties to fulfil a human right to subsis [Protecting human rights requires institutional action, first by one's own sta and then, when necessary, by organizations beyond one's own state such as corporations, NGOs, other wealthy states, and inter-state organizations. But human rights protection does not demand specific policies uniformly applied in every context. Determining the best ways to ensure access to clean air, water, and food is not a philosophical problem. Rather we need to consult the best empirical work of social scientists to judge what works and what does not work. 7