Shade Sails and Passive Recreation in Public Parks of Melbourne and Denver: A Randomized Intervention.
Shade Sails and Passive Recreation in Public Parks of Melbourne and Denver: A Randomized Intervention.
复制标题
DOI：
10.2105/ajph.2017.304071
复制
发表时间：
2017-12
影响因子：
12.7
通讯作者：
Dobbinson S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Buller DB;English DR;Buller MK;Simmons J;Chamberlain JA;Wakefield M;Dobbinson S
测试遮阳帆是否会增加静态康乐区的使用。2010-2014年在澳大利亚墨尔本和美国丹佛进行分层随机前后测对照设计。一个样本的145个公园与两个PRA在充分的阳光下，以1：3的比例随机处理或控制。每个处理公园都有一个PRA建造遮阳帆。结局是研究PRA的任何使用（n=576个试验前和n=576个试验后观察结果; 100%随访）。与对照PRA（调整后的用途：使用概率：前测=0·14，后测=0·17）相比，治疗PRA（前测=0·10，后测=0·32）的使用率在后测时更高，比值比（OR）=3·91，95% CI=1·72，8·93。在丹佛，阴影增加PRA的使用（对照：前测=0·19，后测=0·20;治疗：前测=0·16，后测=0·47）多于墨尔本（对照：前测=0·11，后测=0·14;阴影：前测=0·06，后测=0·19），OR=2·92，95% CI=1·07，7·98。在阴凉处进行公共投资是预防皮肤癌的必要措施，在美国可能特别有用。
To test whether shade sails will increase the use of passive recreation areas (PRAs). A stratified randomized pretest-posttest controlled design was conducted in Melbourne, Australia and Denver, USA in 2010–2014. A sample of 145 public parks with two PRAs in full sun were randomized in a 1:3 ratio to treatment or control. Shade sails were built at one PRA per treatment park. The outcome was any use of study PRA (n=576 pretest and n=576 posttest observations; 100% follow-up). Compared to control PRAs (adjusted probability of use: pretest=0·14, posttest=0·17), use of treatment PRAs (pretest=0·10, posttest=0·32) was higher at posttest, odds ratio (OR)=3·91, 95% CI=1·72, 8·93. Shade increased use of PRAs in Denver (control: pretest=0·19, posttest=0·20; treatment: pretest=0·16, posttest=0·47) more than Melbourne (control: pretest=0·11, posttest=0·14; shaded: pretest=0·06, posttest=0·19), OR=2·92, 95% CI=1·07, 7·98. Public investment in shade is warranted for skin cancer prevention and may be especially useful in the United States.