When a Ban Is Not a Ban: Institutional Work and the Russian Doping Scandal
When a Ban Is Not a Ban: Institutional Work and the Russian Doping Scandal
复制标题
当禁令不再是禁令：机构工作和俄罗斯兴奋剂丑闻
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Marvin Washington
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mathew Dowling;S. Harris;Marvin Washington
与俄罗斯兴奋剂丑闻相比，这种公然违抗以及随后英勇地重新安排制度规范的行为的案例更少。在采用新制度视角时，作者将这起丑闻理论化为一个企图但失败的制度颠覆的案例。更具体地说，作者利用制度变迁文献和制度工作视角来解释围绕着行为者对丑闻的反应的关键事件。该分析使用了Gioia的方法论方法来检验二次经验数据。调查结果揭示了利益攸关方如何绕过传统治理结构，试图扰乱体制安排，但尽管如此，许多先前存在的体制基础设施仍然完好无损。作者解释说，这一结果部分是由于主要管理机构和其他行为者为维持国际体育领域的现状而进行的反机构工作的结果。
There are fewer cases of such blatant acts to defy and subsequent heroic efforts to rearrange institutional norms than the Russian doping scandal. In adopting a neo-institutional perspective, the authors theorize the scandal as a case of attempted but failed institutional disruption. More specifically, the authors draw upon the institutional change literature and the institutional work perspective to explain the key events surrounding actors’ response to the scandal. The analysis utilized Gioia’s methodological approach to examine secondary empirical data. Findings reveal how stakeholders circumvented traditional governance structures in an attempt to disrupt institutional arrangements, but despite this, much of the preexisting institutional infrastructure has remained intact. The authors explain this outcome, in part, as a consequence of the counter-institutional work of key governing agencies and other actors to maintain the status quo within international sport.