Into the Conventional‐Implicature Dimension
Into the Conventional‐Implicature Dimension
复制标题
进入约定-隐含维度
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christopher Potts
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christopher Potts
格莱斯在《逻辑与对话》一书中的一小段话中创造了一个术语，即传统含义。这种描述很直观，也非常耐人寻味。自那以后，被赋予这个标签的现象范围很广，而且种类繁多。我考察了核心的事实动机，认为它大致统一于这样一个观点，即常规含义贡献了一个单独的意义维度。我提供了区分传统含义和其他类型含义的测试，并简要探索了如何将意义的多个维度整合到单一理论中的方法。
Grice coined the term ‘conventional implicature’ in a short passage in ‘Logic and conversation’. The description is intuitive and deeply intriguing. The range of phenomena that have since been assigned this label is large and diverse. I survey the central factual motivation, arguing that it is loosely unified by the idea that conventional implicatures contribute a separate dimension of meaning. I provide tests for distinguishing conventional implicatures from other kinds of meaning, and I briefly explore ways in which one can incorporate multiple dimensions of meaning into a single theory.