Dynamics of a predator-prey system with prey subject to Allee effects and disease

Dynamics of a predator-prey system with prey subject to Allee effects and disease
复制标题

DOI:
10.3934/mbe.2014.11.877
复制
发表时间:
2014-03
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Yun Kang;S. K. Sasmal;Amiya Ranjan Bhowmick;J. Chattopadhyay
Yun Kang;S. K. Sasmal;Amiya Ranjan Bhowmick;J. Chattopadhyay
中科院分区:
工程技术4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yun Kang;S. K. Sasmal;Amiya Ranjan Bhowmick;J. Chattopadhyay

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在本文中,我们提出了一种一般的捕食者-食饵系统,其中食饵受到Allee效应和疾病的影响,具有以下独特的特征:(i)食饵繁殖过程中存在Allee效应,其中感染的食饵(i类)没有贡献;(二)与食用易感猎物(s类)相比,食用受感染猎物对捕食者(p类)增长率的贡献较小或为负。本文给出了这一通用模型的基本动力学性质,并对具体模型(SIP-Allee模型)以及无Allee效应时的相应模型(SIP-no-Allee模型)进行了详细分析;(a) SIP-Allee模型可能只有一个吸引子(所有物种灭绝),两个吸引子(由疾病和捕食者的繁殖数量小或竞争排斥引起的双稳定),或三个吸引子(三稳定);(b) SIP-no-Allee模型可以有一个吸引子(只有S类存活或S和i类的持久性或S和p类的持久性)或两个吸引子(S和i类的持久性或S和p类的持久性的双稳定性)。最有趣的发现之一是,两种模型都不能支持S、I、p三种等级的共存。这是由假设(ii)造成的,其生物学含义是,I类和p类对s类存在剥削性竞争,而I类不可能优于p类,p类不可能从消耗I类中获得显著收益。此外,SIP-Allee模型与SIP-no-Allee模型的动态对比研究得出以下结论:1)存在Allee效应时,物种容易灭绝,初始条件对猎物及其捕食者的生存起着重要作用;(2)在Allee效应存在的情况下,疾病可以拯救被捕食者免于捕食驱动的灭绝,导致S类和i类共存,而捕食者不能拯救疾病驱动的灭绝。这些发现可能在保护生物学中具有潜在的应用价值。
In this article, we propose a general predator-prey system where prey is subject to Allee effects and disease with the following unique features: (i) Allee effects built in the reproduction process of prey where infected prey (I-class) has no contribution; (ii) Consuming infected prey would contribute less or negatively to the growth rate of predator (P-class) in comparison to the consumption of susceptible prey (S-class). We provide basic dynamical properties for this general model and perform the detailed analysis on a concrete model (SIP-Allee Model) as well as its corresponding model in the absence of Allee effects (SIP-no-Allee Model); we obtain the complete dynamics of both models: (a) SIP-Allee Model may have only one attractor (extinction of all species), two attractors (bi-stability either induced by small values of reproduction number of both disease and predator or induced by competition exclusion), or three attractors (tri-stability); (b) SIP-no-Allee Model may have either one attractor (only S-class survives or the persistence of S and I-class or the persistence of S and P-class) or two attractors (bi-stability with the persistence of S and I-class or the persistence of S and P-class). One of the most interesting findings is that neither models can support the coexistence of all three S, I, P-class. This is caused by the assumption (ii), whose biological implications are that I and P-class are at exploitative competition for S-class whereas I-class cannot be superior and P-class cannot gain significantly from its consumption of I-class. In addition, the comparison study between the dynamics of SIP-Allee Model and SIP-no-Allee Model lead to the following conclusions: 1) In the presence of Allee effects, species are prone to extinction and initial condition plays an important role on the surviving of prey as well as its corresponding predator; 2) In the presence of Allee effects, disease may be able to save prey from the predation-driven extinction and leads to the coexistence of S and I-class while predator can not save the disease-driven extinction. All these findings may have potential applications in conservation biology.