Attrition, Selection Bias and Censored Regressions
Attrition, Selection Bias and Censored Regressions
复制标题
自然损耗、选择偏差和审查回归
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-540-75892-1_12
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Marno Verbeek
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bo E. Honoré;F. Vella;Marno Verbeek
In micro-econometric applications issues related to attrition, censoring and nonrandom sample selection frequently arise. For example, it is quite common in empirical work that the variables of interest are partially observed or only observed when some other data requirement is satisfied. These forms of censoring and selectivity frequently cause problems in estimation and can lead to unreliable inference if they are ignored. Consider, for example, the problems which may arise if one is interested in estimating the parameters from a labor supply equation based on the examination of a panel data set and where one’s objective is to make inferences for the whole population rather than only the sample of workers. The first difficulty that arises is that hours are generally only observed for individuals that work. In this way the hours measure is generally censored at zero and this causes difficulties for estimation as straightforward least squares methods, either over the entire sample or only the subsample of workers, are not generally applicable. Second, many of the explanatory variables of interest, such as wages, are also censored in that they are only observed for workers. Moreover, in these instances many of these variables may also be endogenous to labor supply and this may also create complications in estimation. While panel data are frequently seen as a way to overcome issues related to endogeneity as the availability of repeated observations on the same unit can allow the use of various data transformations to eliminate the cause of the endogeneity, in many instances the use of panel data can complicate matters. For example,
影响因子:
6.1
作者:
ROBINSON, PM
通讯作者:
ROBINSON, PM