Pedagogical models of concordance use: correlations between concordance user preferences
Pedagogical models of concordance use: correlations between concordance user preferences
复制标题
索引使用的教学模型：索引用户偏好之间的相关性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
O. Ballance
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O. Ballance
计算机辅助语言学习最有前途的研究方向之一是语言学习者利用语料库的潜力。然而，使用语料库需要使用语料库工具作为接口，通常是一个索引器。如何使学习者最容易使用这样一个工具是一个重要的问题。具体来说，有人建议语言学习者在使用协和语时不应该遵循语料库语言模式。因此，重要的是要检查在多大程度上有不同的原型取向的一致性使用，取向可以为学习者提供使用模式遵循。本文报告了一项研究，提供了经验证据，不同分类的检索用户和检索偏好之间的相关性。它从181个一致性用户的因素分析中得出因素得分，并使用一系列方差分析测试来确定这些得分在不同类别的受访者之间的统计显著差异。然后通过判别函数分析探讨这些差异的主要维度。分析揭示了四个标准中三个标准的不同水平之间的相关性，用户被分类为：一致性使用的频率，一致性使用的语言和一致性使用的领域。结果表明，以不同的检索偏好为标志的两种主要的检索使用模式：分析型检索使用和参考型检索使用。
ABSTRACT One of the most promising avenues of research in computer-assisted language learning is the potential for language learners to make use of language corpora. However, using a corpus requires use of a corpus tool as an interface, typically a concordancer. How such a tool can be made most accessible to learners is an important issue. Specifically, there have been suggestions that language learners should not be following corpus linguistic patterns of concordance use when using concordancers . As such, it is important to examine the extent to which there are different prototypical orientations to concordance use, orientations that can provide models of use for learners to follow. This paper reports a study that provides empirical evidence of correlations between different classifications of concordance user and concordancing preferences. It derives factor scores from a factor analysis of 181 concordance users and uses a series of MANOVA tests to identify statistically significant differences between these scores for different classifications of the respondents. The main dimensions of these differences are then explored through discriminant function analysis. The analyses reveal correlations between different levels of three of the four criteria users were classified by: frequency of concordance use, language of concordance use and field of concordance use. The results suggest two main models of concordance use marked by different concordancing preferences: analysis type concordance use and reference type concordance use.
劳特利奇语料库语言学手册
DOI：
10.4324/9780367076399-37
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Mahlberg M
通讯作者：
Mahlberg M