Measuring communicative participation: A review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology
Measuring communicative participation: A review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology
复制标题
DOI：
10.1044/1058-0360(2006/030
复制
发表时间：
2006-11-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Amtmann, Dagmar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eadie, Tanya L.;Yorkston, Kathryn M.;Amtmann, Dagmar
目的：评估言语病理学中自我报告工具测量交际参与这一结构的充分性。方法：对六种工具进行评估，涉及（a）测量的结构，（b）单个项目与交际参与的相关性，以及（c）其心理测量特性。结果：没有工具专门测量交际参与。所审查工具中的所有项目 (N = 132) 中有 26% (n = 34) 与交流参与一致。 34 个项目中的大多数 (76%) 与一般沟通相关，而其余 24% 的项目与工作、休闲或建立关系时的沟通相关。仪器因心理测量特性而异。结论：没有发现现有的言语病理学自我报告仪器专门用于测量交际参与。开发一种衡量交流参与的工具对于满足我们实践范围的要求至关重要。
Purpose: To assess the adequacy of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology for measuring a construct called communicative participation.Method: Six instruments were evaluated relative to (a) the construct measured, (b) the relevance of individual items to communicative participation, and (c) their psychometric properties.Results: No instrument exclusively measured communicative participation. Twenty-six percent (n = 34) of all items (N= 132) across the reviewed instruments were consistent with communicative participation. The majority (76%) of the 34 items were associated with general communication, while the remaining 24% of the items were associated with communication at work, during leisure, or for establishing relationships. Instruments varied relative to psychometric properties.Conclusions: No existing self-report instruments in speech-language pathology were found to be solely dedicated to measuring communicative participation. Developing an instrument for measuring communicative participation is essential for meeting the requirements of our scope of practice.