Concord in minimalist theory
Concord in minimalist theory
复制标题
DOI：
10.1162/002438900554370
复制
发表时间：
2000-03-01
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Carstens, V
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carstens, V
DP中的Concord认为，移动是由目标或移动项目的不可解释的特征驱动的，反对Chomsky 1995。不可解释的φ特征，其中concord组成必须消除LF，以满足充分的解释。但是，在乔姆斯基的系统中，将变形AP和KP提升到与N-0的关系检查中是没有动机的，因为N-0没有这些项目可以检查的不可解释的特征。假设Kayne（1994，1998）的AP建议，这个问题可以部分克服，但屈折的“of”结构仍然缺乏一个帐户。乔姆斯基（1998）的探测目标方法应用于concord也遇到了困难，在（1995）系统的修订中避免了：如果AP和KP的phi特征驱动它们提高检查，则获得正确的结果。
Concord within DP argues that movement is driven by uninterpretable features of either the target or the moved item, contra Chomsky 1995. The uninterpretable phi-features of which concord consists must be eliminated by LF, to satisfy Full Interpretation. But raising of inflected APs and KPs into checking relations with N-0 cannot be motivated, in Chomsky's system, since N-0 has no uninterpretable features that these items can check. Assuming Kayne's (1994, 1998) proposal for APs, the problem can be partially overcome, but inflected 'of' constructions still lack an account. Chomsky's (1998) probe-goal approach applied to concord also encounters difficulties, avoided under revision of the (1995) system: if the phi-features of APs and KPs drive them to raise for checking, correct results are obtained.