After James on Identity
After James on Identity
复制标题
詹姆斯论身份之后
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199535231.003.0019
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
A. Carlsen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Carlsen
文章主要有四个部分。首先，它介绍了一些背景下，詹姆斯和他的工作，指出链的影响，组织研究，并讨论了他的自我概念是如何形成的历史环境和个人经验。其次，它简要概述了组织认同理论的主要原则，并认为它主要集中在詹姆斯所谓的“自我作为对象”的等价性。第三，它给出了一个治疗詹姆斯的意思是“自我作为主体”，以及如何可以被理解为集体创作过程，植根于实践。最后，它讨论了两套的影响，遵循詹姆斯的自我观：把身份到组织实践和社会变革。
The article has four main parts. First, it introduces some context on James and his work, points to strands of influence on organization studies, and discusses how his conceptions of self were shaped by historical circumstances and personal experiences. Second, it briefly overviews key tenets of organizational identity theory and argues that it has been predominantly focused on the equivalence of what James called ‘self-as-object’. Third, it gives a treatment of what James meant by ‘self-as-subject’and how that may be understood as collective processes of authoring, rooted in practice. Finally, it discusses two sets of the implications that follow from James's view of self: bringing identity into organizational practice and into social change.