Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States
Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/01944363.2014.976585
复制
发表时间：
2014-10-02
影响因子：
5.6
通讯作者：
Horney, Jennifer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Berke, Philip;Cooper, John;Horney, Jennifer
问题，研究策略和调查结果：考虑如何重建社区的灾前恢复计划是在高度不确定性和快速变化期间支持恢复能力的合乎逻辑的第一步，但对恢复计划的关注有限。在这项研究中，我们评估了东南部八个州的地方灾难恢复规划，发现这种规划得到的公众支持有限：不到三分之一的脆弱地方司法管辖区有恢复计划，这些计划的计划质量得分较低。没有资金的州授权产生的计划比其他没有授权的州的计划要弱。我们发现，一个合作的利益相关者网络最初打算重新排序的优先级结果在更强的plannes.Takeaway实践：本地恢复规划应设计为在高度不确定的条件下运行。地方管辖区可以选择反映其如何建立恢复规划能力的计划设计方案：1）独立的全社区恢复计划; 2）综合土地使用计划; 3）应急管理计划; 4）小区域恢复计划。由于恢复规划缺乏公众支持，而且对大多数地方管辖区来说是新的，因此，独立的全社区恢复计划设计方案在建立地方承诺方面最为有效。这一方案涉及一个计划制定过程，集中时间、精力和资源，建立一个利益相关者网络，这些利益相关者可能对重建工作负有最大责任，因为他们最关心灾害的影响。
Problem, research strategy and findings: A pre-disaster recovery plan that considers how a community should be redeveloped is a logical first step to support resiliency during high uncertainty and rapid change, yet limited attention has been given to recovery plans. In this study, we evaluate local disaster recovery planning in eight southeastern states and find that such planning receives limited public support: Less than one-third of vulnerable local jurisdictions had a recovery plan, and those plans received low plan quality scores. Unfunded state mandates produce weaker plans than plans in other states without mandates. We find that a collaborative network of stakeholders initially intent on reordering priorities results in stronger plans.Takeaway for practice: Local recovery planning should be designed to operate under conditions of high uncertainty. Local jurisdictions can choose plan design options that reflect how they build capability for recovery planning: 1) standalone community-wide recovery plan; 2) comprehensive land use plan; 3) emergency management plan; and 4) small area recovery plan. Because recovery planning lacks a public constituency, and is new to most local jurisdictions, the stand-alone community-wide recovery plan design option is the most effective at building local commitment. This option involves a plan-making process that concentrates time, effort, and resources focused on a building a network of stakeholders who likely have the greatest responsibility in rebuilding efforts because they care most about the impacts of a disaster.