Comparative integration context theory: participation and belonging in new diverse European cities

Comparative integration context theory: participation and belonging in new diverse European cities
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/01419871003624068
复制
发表时间:
2010-01-01
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Schneider, Jens
Schneider, Jens
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Crul, Maurice;Schneider, Jens

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

根据TIES对8个欧洲国家的第二代移民的调查结果,作者提出了一个关于融合或同化的新观点。所提出的比较整合情境理论认为,欧洲城市的社会组织参与和当地社区归属强烈依赖于整合情境。一体化背景的差异包括教育、劳动力市场、住房、宗教和立法方面的制度安排。社会和政治背景的差异对社会和文化参与和归属感尤为重要。TIES的数据显示,第二代移民在当地的参与度很高,单一民族财产的中心地位正在下降——这反映了欧洲城市中种族和(次)文化景观的巨大变化。本文挑战了“新来者”和“本地人”的既定概念,探讨了“主流的重塑”,并主张对流动途径进行调查,以便更好地理解整合或同化作为正在进行的过程。
Drawing upon results from the TIES survey on the second generation in eight European countries the authors propose a new perspective on integration or assimilation. The proposed comparative integration context theory argues that participation in social organizations and belonging to local communities across European cities is strongly dependent on the integration context. Differences in integration contexts include institutional arrangements in education, the labour market, housing, religion and legislation. Differences in the social and political context are especially important for social and cultural participation and belonging. The TIES data show high degrees of local involvement in the second generation and the dwindling centrality of single ethnic belongings - a reflection of the dramatically changing ethnic and (sub)cultural landscapes in cities in Europe. The article challenges established notions of 'newcomers' and 'natives', explores the 'remaking of the mainstream' and argues for the investigation of mobility pathways for a better understanding of integration or assimilation as on-going processes.