An Analysis of Test-Wiseness

An Analysis of Test-Wiseness
复制标题

测试智慧分析

DOI:
10.1177/001316446502500304
复制
发表时间:
1965
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
R. Ebel
R. Ebel
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Millman;Carol H. Bishop;R. Ebel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

错误。测试智慧是建议的来源之一。 “测试智慧”的一般定义被定义为受试者利用测试的特征和形式和/或考试情况获得高分的能力。从逻辑上讲,测试智慧与考生对这些项目所测量的主题的知识无关。本文将分析测试明智性的一个有限的概念。分析将排除与考生一般心理态度(如焦虑和自信)和动机状态有关的因素,并且仅限于实际参加(而不是准备)客观成绩和能力倾向测试。应试智慧的实证研究 似乎没有对应试智慧的重要性或可教授或测量的程度进行系统研究。即使专业作家(例如 Vernon,1962;Anastasi,1961;Pauck,1950)和通俗作家(例如 Whyte,1956;Huff,1961;Hoff)也是如此。
error. Test-wiseness was one suggested source. General Definition &dquo;Test-wiseness&dquo; is defined as a subject’s capacity to utilize the characteristics and formats of the test and/or the test taking situation to receive a high score. Test-wiseness is logically independent of the examinee’s knowledge of the subject matter for which the items are supposedly measures. A somewhat limited concept of test-wiseness will be analyzed in this article. The analysis will exclude factors concerned with the general mental attitude (such as anxiety and confidence) and motivational state of the examinee, and it will be restricted to the actual taking of (not preparing for) objective achievement and aptitude tests. Empirical Studies of Test-Wiseness There appears to be no systematic study of either the importance of test-wiseness or the degree to which it can be taught or measured. This is true even though both professional writers (e.g. Vernon, 1962; Anastasi, 1961; Pauck, 1950) and popular writers (e.g. Whyte, 1956; Huff, 1961; Hoff-