Particle-shape monitoring and control in crystallization processes
Particle-shape monitoring and control in crystallization processes
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/aic.690470922
复制
发表时间:
2001-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Rawlings, JB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Patience, DB;Rawlings, JB
Limitations of sensors for the on-line measurement of solid~ phase properties have restricted the development and implementation of improved design, monitoring, and control methods for crystallizers and other particulate processes. Image analysis has recently become a popular technique to monitor crystal size and shape in crystallization processes. Plummer and Kausch (1995) used image analysis to measure the real-time crystal size density (CSD) of polyoxymethylene as it crystallizes on a static stage under a microscope. Mon-nier et al.(1997) use image analysis to measure the final CSDs of adipic acid in water crystallization. Puel et al.(1997) use image analysis to measure two characteristic lengths of by-droquinone crystals as a function of time. The technique is not yet fully automated, however, and the crystal slurry is manually sampled and placed under the microscope. In addition, imaging requires an operator to occasionally interrupt automatic sizing and discard measurements before taking more samples. In their review, Braatz and Hasebe (2001) dis-cuss the recently available in situ Lasentec particle and vision measurement (PVM) system. This sensor provides two-di-mensional images of crystals in random orientation, however, the authors state that the quality of the images limits the ability of imaging software to automatically identify individual particles but is suitable for qualitative troubleshooting. Image analysis has not yet been demonstrated to automati-cally monitor in real time the size and shape characteristics of crystals in a suspension crystallizer. The strong advantage of image analysis in the preceding applications, however, is that it requires almost no assumptions about particle size or shape and does not require inversion of a signal and interence of the resultant particle size or shape density. Although image analysis is a direct observation technique, it is a twodimensional measurement and care must be taken if one is to infer a three-dimensional shape. Limited information regarding shape can be extracted from two-dimensional binarized images of objects given adequate sampling. Podczeck (2000) reviews the history of the range of methods used to assess the shape of particles from a two-dimensional image. Podczeck (1997) motivates the need to de-fine new shape factors that are simple to calculate and incor