<i>In vivo</i> Assessment of Tissue Compatibility of Root Canal Sealer Containing Surface Pre-reacted Glass-ionomer Fillers
<i>In vivo</i> Assessment of Tissue Compatibility of Root Canal Sealer Containing Surface Pre-reacted Glass-ionomer Fillers
复制标题
含有表面预反应玻璃离子聚合物填料的根管封闭剂的组织相容性体内评估
DOI:
10.11471/odep.2022-005
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Nishida Erika,
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tanaka Saori;Miyaji Hirofumi;Mayumi Kayoko;Kanemoto Yukimi;Nishida Erika,
Purpose: Surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) fillers possess properties of releasing ions such as fluoride, strontium, and borate ions, and exhibit bioactive effects. In this study, we assessed the in vivo preclinical effect of a sealer containing S-PRG filler (S-PRG sealer). Specifically, we evaluated the inflammatory response of periapical tissues to the use of S-PRG sealer in root filling, compared to that of sealers with other main components (mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), resin, and noneugenol-zinc oxide (ZO)).Materials and Methods: Under general and local anesthesia, premolar pulpectomies were performed in 10-month-old beagle dogs. After root canal preparation, cleaning, and drying, root filling was performed by applying various sealers with gutta-percha master points. Periapical lucency was analyzed radiographically, and the area of inflammatory cell infiltration with bone resorption was analyzed histologically. The inflammatory response of periapical tissues to S-PRG sealer was compared to those of clinically used sealers including MTA (Pro Root MTA), resin (AH Plus), and ZO (Canals N). Tissue specimens were prepared at 1 month and 6 months after obturation.Results: Periapical lucency was observed at 1 month in all groups. However, at 6 months, periapical lucency persisted with Canals N, but was infrequent with the other three fillers. In histological sections at 1 month, all groups showed similar levels of infiltration of inflammatory cells into the periodontal tissues adjacent to the root apical foramen. After 6 months, inflammation of the periodontal tissues was significantly improved (p< 0.05) for all sealers except for Canals N.Conclusion: The inflammatory response to S-PRG sealer at periapical tissues was milder than that to Canals N. The S-PRG sealer may provide biocompatibility comparable with that of commonly and clinically used Pro Root MTA and AH Plus in the healing of the periapical region.