Cognitive strategies for peer judgments.
Cognitive strategies for peer judgments.
复制标题
同伴判断的认知策略。
作者：
Olsson, Henrik;Barman-Adhikari, Anamika;Galesic, Mirta;Hsu, Hsun-Ta;Rice, Eric
人们如何判断同龄人的特征？我们调查了什么认知策略的基础同行的判断，什么样的群体水平的判断模式，这些策略产生，以及他们是否产生准确的判断。我们开发了一个通用的模型，可以比较不同的认知策略，包括自我投射，概率匹配，和三个基于记忆的策略。我们使用一个独特的数据集，包括自我报告和估计的同龄人的物质使用经历无家可归的青年（N= 239）。我们发现证据的适应性使用的策略，是最合适的信息提供一个人的个人经验和社会环境。在群体层面上，判断的模式有时类似于错误的共识，有时类似于错误的独特性，但总体上显示出很高的准确性。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2023阿帕，保留所有权利）
How do people make judgments about characteristics of their peers? We investigate what cognitive strategies underlie peer judgments, what group-level patterns of judgments these strategies produce, and whether they generate accurate judgments. We develop a general model that allows for comparison of different cognitive strategies including ego projection, probability matching, and three memory-based strategies. We examine it using a unique data set including self-reports and estimates of peer substance use among youth experiencing homelessness (N= 239). We find evidence for the adaptive use of strategies that are most appropriate given the information available from one’s personal experience and social environment. On the group level, the pattern of judgments sometimes resembles false consensus and sometimes false uniqueness, but overall shows a high level of accuracy.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)