Ertel Potential Vorticity versus Bernoulli Potential on Approximately Neutral Surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
Ertel Potential Vorticity versus Bernoulli Potential on Approximately Neutral Surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
复制标题
南极绕极流中近似中性表面上的埃特尔位涡度与伯努利势的关系
DOI:
10.1175/jpo-d-19-0140.1
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Stanley G
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stanley G
We investigate the relationship between Ertel potential vorticityQand Bernoulli potentialBon orthobaric density surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), using the Southern Ocean State Estimate. Similar to the extratropical atmospheres of Earth and Mars,QandBcorrelate in the ACC in a function-like manner with modest scatter. Below the near-surface, the underlying function relatingQandBappears to be nearly linear. Nondimensionalizing its slope yields “Ma,” a “Mach” number for long Rossby waves, the ratio of the local flow speed to the intrinsic long Rossby wave speed. We empirically estimate the latter using established and novel techniques that yield qualitatively consistent results. Previous work related “Ma” to the degree of homogeneity ofQand to Arnol’d’s shear stability criteria. Estimates of “Ma” for the whole ACC are notably positive, implying inhomogeneousQ, on all circumpolar buoyancy surfaces studied. Upper layers generally exhibit “Ma” slightly less than unity, suggesting that shear instability may operate within these layers. Deep layers exhibit “Ma” greater than unity, implying stability. On surfaces shallower than 1000 m just north of the ACC, theQversusBslope varies strongly on subannual and interannual time scales, but “Ma” hovers near unity. We also study spatial variability: the ACC is speckled with hundreds of small-scale features with “Ma” near unity, whereas away from the ACC “Ma” is more commonly negative or above unity, both corresponding to stability. Maps of the time-mean “Ma” show stable regions occupy most of the Southern Ocean, except for several topographically controlled hotspots where “Ma” is always near unity.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/j.jastp.2016.10.016
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Cao Chen;X. Chu
通讯作者:
X. Chu
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Cerovecki, Ivana;Meijers, Andrew J. S.;Holland, Paul R.
通讯作者:
Holland, Paul R.
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
J. Maddison;D. Marshall;J. Shipton
通讯作者:
J. Maddison;D. Marshall;J. Shipton
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
Klocker, Andreas;Marshall, David P.
通讯作者:
Marshall, David P.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Abernathey, Ryan;Marshall, John;Shuckburgh, Emily
通讯作者:
Shuckburgh, Emily