Anti-Interleukin-31 Receptor A Antibody for Atopic Dermatitis

Anti-Interleukin-31 Receptor A Antibody for Atopic Dermatitis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1606490
复制
发表时间:
2017-03-02
影响因子:
158.5
通讯作者:
Kabashima, Kenji
Kabashima, Kenji
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ruzicka, Thomas;Hanifin, Jon M.;Kabashima, Kenji

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景白细胞介素31可能在特应性皮炎和瘙痒的病理生物学机制中发挥作用。我们想要评估 nemolizumab (CIM331)(一种针对白细胞介素 31 受体 A 的人源化抗体)治疗特应性皮炎的有效性和安全性。方法在这项 2 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、为期 12 周的试验中,我们将局部治疗未能充分控制的中度至重度特应性皮炎成人分配给 每 4 周接受皮下注射 nemolizumab(剂量为每公斤体重 0.1 mg、0.5 mg 或 2.0 mg)或安慰剂,或每 8 周接受每公斤体重 2.0 mg 探索剂量的 nemolizumab。主要终点是第 12 周时瘙痒视觉模拟评分(负值变化表示改善)相对于基线的改善百分比。次要终点包括湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI,负值变化表示改善)评分的变化以及特应性皮炎的体表面积。 结果 在接受随机分组的 264 名患者中,216 名 (82%) 完成了 学习。第 12 周时,每 4 周接受奈莫利珠单抗治疗的患者中,0.1 mg 组的瘙痒视觉模拟量表变化为 -43.7%,0.5 mg 组为 -59.8%,2.0 mg 组为 -63.1%,而安慰剂组为 -20.9%(P
BACKGROUNDInterleukin-31 may play a role in the pathobiologic mechanism of atopic dermatitis and pruritus. We wanted to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab (CIM331), a humanized antibody against interleukin-31 receptor A, in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.METHODSIn this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial, we assigned adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that was inadequately controlled by topical treatments to receive subcutaneous nemolizumab (at a dose of 0.1 mg, 0.5 mg, or 2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo every 4 weeks or an exploratory dose of 2.0 mg of nemolizumab per kilogram every 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage improvement from baseline in the score on the pruritus visual-analogue scale (on which a negative change indicates improvement) at week 12. Secondary end points included changes in the score on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI, on which a negative change indicates improvement), and body-surface area of atopic dermatitis.RESULTSOf 264 patients who underwent randomization, 216 (82%) completed the study. At week 12, among the patients who received nemolizumab every 4 weeks, changes on the pruritus visual-analogue scale were -43.7% in the 0.1-mg group, -59.8% in the 0.5-mg group, and -63.1% in the 2.0-mg group, versus -20.9% in the placebo group (P