Development and Validation of a Parenting Stress Module for Parents of Children Using Cochlear Implants.

Development and Validation of a Parenting Stress Module for Parents of Children Using Cochlear Implants.
复制标题

为使用人工耳蜗的儿童父母开发和验证育儿压力模块。

DOI:
10.1093/jpepsy/jsac018
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Quittner,AlexandraL
Quittner,AlexandraL
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cejas,Ivette;Coto,Jennifer;Sarangoulis,Christina;Hoffman,MichaelF;Quittner,AlexandraL

文献摘要

相似文献

ObjectivesThe目的本研究的目的是开发和验证人工耳蜗植入(CI)的具体育儿压力措施使用FDA的指导病人报告的结果(2009)MethodsThe开发和心理测试验证的育儿压力CI模块的幼儿(EC; 0-5岁)和学龄(SA; 6-12岁)版本在这篇文章中报道。工具开发包括定性访谈与CI儿童的父母(EC:N= 19; SA:N= 21),内容分析,项目开发和认知测试的工具。最后,我们进行了心理测量学验证(EC:N= 72; SA:N= 64),包括内部一致性,重测信度(两次管理之间的102周;N= 24),和收敛效度与父母压力指数-4(PSI-4)的分析结果最终EC版本包括15个问题,SA版本包括8个问题。EC和SA版本都具有很强的信度(EC α = .88; SA α = .85),所有项目与整体模块显著相关(r= .43-.80)。两个版本也有很强的重测信度(r=.99,p < .001)。最后,收敛效度的分析表明,PSI-4总压力量表的两个育儿压力CI版本(ECr=.66,p < .00; SAr=.45,p < .001)显着相关性。结论育儿压力CI模块是可靠和有效的条件特定的育儿压力工具,为0-12岁的CI儿童的父母,填补了文献中的一个显着空白。这些经过充分验证的工具可用于评估父母对支持的需求,并指导制定有针对性的、以家庭为中心的干预措施。
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to develop and validate a cochlear implant (CI)-specific parenting stress measure using the FDA Guidance on Patient-Reported Outcomes (2009).MethodsThe development and psychometric validation of the Parenting Stress-CI module for both the Early Childhood (EC; 0–5 years) and School-Age (SA; 6–12 years) versions are reported in this article. Instrument development consisted of qualitative interviews with parents of children with CIs (EC:N= 19; SA:N= 21), content analysis, item development, and cognitive testing of the instrument. Last, we conducted the psychometric validation (EC:N= 72; SA:N= 64), including analyses of internal consistency, test–retest reliability (∼2 weeks between administrations;N= 24), and convergent validity with the Parenting Stress Index-4 (PSI-4).ResultsThe final EC version includes 15 questions, and the SA version includes 8 questions. Both the EC and SA versions had strong reliability (EC α = .88; SA α = .85), with all items significantly correlated with the overall module (r= .43–.80). Both versions also had strong test–retest reliability (r= .99,p< .001). Last, analyses of convergent validity demonstrated significant correlations with the PSI-4 Total Stress scale for both Parenting Stress-CI versions (ECr= .66,p< .00; SAr= .45,p< .001).ConclusionsThe Parenting Stress-CI modules are reliable and valid condition-specific parenting stress instruments for parents of children with CIs ages 0–12 years, filling a significant gap in the literature. These fully validated instruments can be used to assess parental needs for support and guide the development of targeted, family centered interventions.