THE MECHANICS OF BRAIN INJURIES
THE MECHANICS OF BRAIN INJURIES
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071895
复制
发表时间:
1945-01-01
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
HOLBOURN, AHS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
HOLBOURN, AHS
There is some truth in almost all the theories of the mechanisms of brain injuries due to violence (Jakob, 1912; Sjovall, 1943; Anzelius, 1943), but in the writer's view (Holbourn, 1943; 1944a) only skull-bending, fracture, and rotation (Goggio, 1941) of the head are important. The physicist would attribute the comparative failure of most of the theorists to their wrong method of approaching the problem, in that they began by fastening their attention on a particular mechanism (eg coup and contrecoup, or production of cerebral anaemia). The physicist's initial assumption is that damage to the brain is a consequence, direct or indirect, of the movements, forces and deformations at each point in the brain. The movements, forces and deformations arc not independent; so that it is sufficient to express everything in terms of deformations. These are worked out with strict adherence to Newton's laws of motion, but with approximations to the constitution and shape of skull and brain. Hence further advances can come only from making better approximations.The Forces to be Considered As a consequence of the principle of superposition, it is reasonably correct to assume in this particular problem that each cause produces its own independent injury. These causes may be regarded as (a) forces on the brain resulting from bending of the skull,(b) forces resulting from fracture of the skull or separation of sutures,(c) forces resulting from movement of the head as a whole and which would exist even if the skull were undeformable.(c) may be sub-divided into (cj) linear acceleration forces,(c,) rotational acceleration forces,(Cj) centrifugal forces,(cj) Coriolis forces. Of these (Cj) and (c4) are clearly negligible. Now it is allowable to analyse the deformations of each Infinitesimal element due to (a, b, clr Ct) into two and only two types (a) change of shape; or distortion, without change of volume (this is analysed by physicists into a set of shearstrains) and (P) a change in volume without distortion,(a) is extremely liable to injure animate (Holbourn, 1944b) or inanimate objects.(P) is of two kinds (px) decrease in volume due to increase of hydrostatic pressure and (P,) increase in volume due to decrease in hydrostatic pressure. Common sense suggests that (P^ is harmless provided it does not cause prolonged occlusion of blood vessels. Its harmlessness has been verified for peripheral nerves (Grundfest, 1936).(Pg) is also harmless unless the decrease in pressure is sufficient to cause cavitation, ie liberation of bubbles of vapour or dissolved gases.