The Functional Movement Screening Tool Does Not Predict Injury In Football

The Functional Movement Screening Tool Does Not Predict Injury In Football
复制标题

功能性运动筛查工具无法预测足球运动中的损伤

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
Progress in Orthopedic Science
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Hodgson
L. Hodgson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Christopher Rusling;K. Edwards;A. Bhattacharya;A. Reed;Stuart Irwin;A. Boles;A. Potts;L. Hodgson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:功能性运动屏幕(FMS)被用来预测运动中受伤风险较高的个体,如美式橄榄球。然而,FMS与足球(又名足球)中受伤之间的关系尚未被量化。目前的文献并没有暗示FMS是否在预测这一特定运动群体的损伤中起作用。目的:评价7项FMS任务与英国某职业足球俱乐部球员一个赛季非接触性损伤发生率的关系。方法:以某职业足球俱乐部足球学院135名8 ~ 21岁的足球运动员为研究对象。运动员进行FMS,然后在整个研究期间进行观察,记录并确定每1000个训练和比赛小时的受伤发生率。结果:深蹲(p=0.0128)和躯干稳定性俯卧撑(p=0.0621)是非接触性损伤的显著预测因子。躯干稳定性俯卧撑得分为3分的运动员受伤风险显著低于得分为1分的运动员。躯干稳定性俯卧撑得分为2分的运动员也有类似的趋势,但这在统计学上并不显著。FMS总分与损伤无统计学意义相关。结论:在某职业足球俱乐部青训营的青少年球员中,7个FMS成分中的2个与非接触性损伤发生率之间似乎只有统计学上显著的关联。需要进行进一步的调查,以确定这些结果是否反映了英国青训计划中的青训足球人口。
Background: The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is used to predict individuals at heightened risk of injury within sports such as American Football. However, the relationship between the FMS and injury within football (a.k.a. soccer) has yet to be quantified. The current literature does not allude to whether the FMS has a role in predicting injury within this sport specific group. Objective: To evaluate the association between the 7 FMS tasks and the incidence of non-contact injury amongst football players from a professional English football club over one season. Methods: 135 footballers between the ages of 8 and 21 years from one professional football club’s academy were used. Players performed the FMS and then were observed throughout the study period to record and establish injury incidence in rates per 1000 training and match hours. Results: The deep squat (p=0.0128) and trunk stability push-up (p=0.0621) were significant predictors of non-contact injury. Players with a trunk stability push up score of 3 had a statistically significant lower risk of injury than those with a score of 1. There was a similar trend for players with a trunk stability push up score of 2, but this was not statistically significant. Total FMS score was not statistically significantly related to injury. Conclusion: There appears to be only statistically significant associations between 2 of the 7 FMS components and non-contact injury incidence within youth players from one professional football clubs’ academy. Further investigations need to be conducted to see whether these results reflect the academy football population within the English academy programme.