Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus placebo added to basal insulin analogues (with or without metformin) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus placebo added to basal insulin analogues (with or without metformin) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/dom.12539
复制
发表时间:
2015-11
期刊:
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
NN2211-3917 Study Group
NN2211-3917 Study Group
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ahmann A;Rodbard HW;Rosenstock J;Lahtela JT;de Loredo L;Tornøe K;Boopalan A;Nauck MA;NN2211-3917 Study Group

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病成人患者[糖化血红蛋白(HbA 1c)7.0-10.0%(53-86 mmol/mol)]中,确认在既存基础胰岛素类似物±二甲双胍基础上添加利拉鲁肽与安慰剂相比的优效性。在这项在诊所或医院进行的26周、双盲、平行组研究中,451例受试者以1:1的比例随机接受利拉鲁肽1.8 mg每日一次治疗(剂量分别从0.6和1.2 mg/天递增,各持续1周; n = 226)或安慰剂(n = 225)加至其既存基础胰岛素类似物(≥20 U/天)±二甲双胍(≥1500 mg/天)。随机化后,不允许将胰岛素调整至高于研究前剂量。主要终点为HbA 1c变化。26周后,利拉鲁肽组HbA 1c下降幅度[-1.3%(-14.2 mmol/mol)]大于安慰剂组[-0.1%(-1.2 mmol/mol); p < 0.0001]。更多接受利拉鲁肽治疗的受试者达到HbA 1c目标:<7.0%(59% vs 14%; p < 0.0001)和≤6.5%(43% vs 4%; p < 0.0001),使用略少的胰岛素(35.8 IU vs 40.1 IU)。空腹血糖(−1.3 mmol/l)、7点血糖曲线(− 1.6 mmol/l)、体重(−3.1 kg)和收缩压(−5.0 mmHg)较基线的降幅更大(与安慰剂相比的估计治疗差异; p < 0.0001)。利拉鲁肽组的一过性胃肠道不良事件(恶心:22.2% vs 3.1%)和轻度低血糖(18.2% vs 12.4%)的发生率高于安慰剂组,与安慰剂组相比,脉搏增加(4.5次/分钟)。未发生重度低血糖或胰腺炎。与安慰剂相比,在基础胰岛素类似物±二甲双胍中添加利拉鲁肽可显著改善血糖控制、体重和收缩压。利拉鲁肽组的典型胃肠道症状和轻微低血糖发生率更高。
To confirm the superiority, compared with placebo, of adding liraglutide to pre‐existing basal insulin analogue ± metformin in adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0–10.0% (53–86 mmol/mol)]. In this 26‐week, double‐blind, parallel‐group study, conducted in clinics or hospitals, 451 subjects were randomized 1 : 1 to once‐daily liraglutide 1.8 mg (dose escalated from 0.6 and 1.2 mg/day, respectively, for 1 week each; n = 226) or placebo (n = 225) added to their pre‐existing basal insulin analogue (≥20 U/day) ± metformin (≥1500 mg/day). After randomization, insulin adjustments above the pre‐study dose were not allowed. The primary endpoint was HbA1c change. After 26 weeks, HbA1c decreased more with liraglutide [−1.3% (−14.2 mmol/mol)] than with placebo [−0.1% (−1.2 mmol/mol); p < 0.0001]. More subjects on liraglutide reached HbA1c targets: <7.0% (59% vs 14%; p < 0.0001) and ≤6.5% (43% vs 4%; p < 0.0001) using slightly less insulin (35.8 IU vs 40.1 IU). Greater decreases from baseline (estimated treatment differences vs placebo; p < 0.0001) occurred in fasting plasma glucose (−1.3 mmol/l), seven‐point glucose profiles (−1.6 mmol/l), body weight (−3.1 kg) and systolic blood pressure (−5.0 mmHg). Transient gastrointestinal adverse events (nausea: 22.2% vs 3.1%) and minor hypoglycaemia (18.2% vs 12.4%) were more frequent with liraglutide than placebo, and pulse increased (4.5 beats/min) compared with placebo. No severe hypoglycaemia or pancreatitis occurred. Adding liraglutide to a basal insulin analogue ± metformin significantly improved glycaemic control, body weight and systolic blood pressure compared with placebo. Typical gastrointestinal symptoms and minor hypoglycaemia were more frequent with liraglutide.
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12262
发表时间: 2014-07-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Mathieu, C.;Rodbard, H. W.;Zinman, B.
通讯作者: Zinman, B.
DOI: 10.4158/ep11290.or
发表时间: 2012-07-01
期刊: ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Lando, Howard M.;Alattar, May;Dua, Anuradha P.
通讯作者: Dua, Anuradha P.
DOI: 10.1056/nejmsa1213829
发表时间: 2013-04-25
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
Ali, Mohammed K.;Bullard, Kai McKeever;Gregg, Edward W.
通讯作者: Gregg, Edward W.
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12108
发表时间: 2013-10-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Flint, A.;Kapitza, C.;Zdravkovic, M.
通讯作者: Zdravkovic, M.
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.09.002
发表时间: 2012-04-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Lind, Marcus;Jendle, Johan;Lager, Ibe
通讯作者: Lager, Ibe